Attorney wrote:First, I consider both areas equally free.
Disagree. One is occupied by force, one is controlled by the government. The occupied area is not "free" in the simplest sense of the word.
Attorney wrote:On the other hand Greek Side is fanatic in the way they want to treat Turks as the second class people in a future state like they treat the Filipinos now.
Disagree. RoC is a one-man one-vote kinda gig - this is not fanatical. Every RoC resident (whether GC or other) gets a vote.
Attorney wrote:.. I must say that if you do not want to be considered a TRNC citizen there is only one way you can be treated in the TRNC and that is being treated as a foreigner.
What if you feel that the occupied areas are not TRNC but RoC ? This is the view of the UN, and of the my country, the UK. Being an RoC citizen in the RoC should not make you feel like a foreigner. Period.
Attorney wrote:For the TC crossing to the Greek Controlled Areas, I assure you that they are treated as foreigners if they do not have a RoC issued ID card. They wait at the barricade for a background check etc.
All but RoC ID holders are checked. Regardless of "TC".
Attorney wrote:I believe the Greek government did the right thing by not giving the titles of the Turkish Property to Greeks and the Turkish Government made a mistake by giving titles of the Greek Property to the Turks. But I am sure that they are not going to make another mistake by trying to sole this chaos by creating another one.
I accept the guarantor rights of intervention. However the first mistake of Turkey was to not recreate the 1960 constitution as per the rights of the guarantor(s). Subsequent "mistakes" include occuping the land, giving property away and the "creation" of a new "state". Unfortuantely the mistake you accept Turkey has made is the biggest problem on the island. Without this problem their would be one major obstruction missing from the solution process.
Attorney wrote:So, whoever still believes that they are going to get back what they left in Kyrenia or Famagusta or whereever else on the Turkish Side, I suggest them to wake up and realize that it is not possible.
Those that beleive in a solution involving property hand-back, are those that believe in the greater good. They are not asleep.
Attorney wrote:If they go at least once to see that their farmlands or houses, which the newest of them would be 31 year old now,they are nowhere near to what they were before. This is going to make it so much easier for the GC to understand that no plan will allow them to get these properties back.
I think that the recent movements in Israel prove that occupied land can be handed back, and will give greater confidence to all (not just GC) that wish to have their occupied area back.