The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


The TRNC to open up Maras.

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby boulio » Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:42 pm

http://www.trncinfo.com/tanitmadairesi/ ... ENTS/6.htm

both agreements,77 and 79 funny no mention of bi-zonality.
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby Viewpoint » Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:44 pm

Implementation?
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby bill cobbett » Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:45 pm

boulio wrote:http://www.trncinfo.com/tanitmadairesi/2002/ENGLISH/DOCUMENTS/6.htm

both agreements,77 and 79 funny no mention of bi-zonality.


Absolutely Boulio .... there was never any mention whatsoever about bi-zonal in those agreements... agreed.

There is however a clear ref to the unconditional return of Varosi, before the rest of a settlement.
User avatar
bill cobbett
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15759
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Embargoed from Kyrenia by Jurkish Army and Genocided (many times) by Thieving, Brain-Washed Lordo

Postby bill cobbett » Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:47 pm

Viewpoint wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:
B25 wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:The port for Maras swap is not a balanced one, a more balanced one would be to have the closed town opened up under the TRNC and allow property owners to return.


Varosi, is not yours to give up, nogotiate or otherwise. You have stolen it, by brute force and we are held back by the end of your guns.

You have nothing to negotiate with, you don't even have a voice, your pay masters do. So stop trying to be cocky about what you can and can't do, we are talking direct, not to puppets. capish!


... and VP is reneging, as ever, on a deal.

This is point no.5 of the 1979 High Level Agreement...

5. Priority will be given to reaching agreement on the resettlement of Varosha under United Nations auspices simultaneously with the beginning of the consideration by the interlocutors of the constitutional and territorial aspects of a canprehensive settlement. After agreement on Varosha has been reached, it will be implemented without waiting the outcome of the discussion on other aspects of the Cyprus problem.


Can you give us full details of the other points and when they were put in effect?


Your mate Donktosh, who rather like you VP likes to renege on deals, tore up the whole of the High Level Agreements by declaring Illegal UDI in 1983... you should know this.
User avatar
bill cobbett
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15759
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Embargoed from Kyrenia by Jurkish Army and Genocided (many times) by Thieving, Brain-Washed Lordo

Postby Viewpoint » Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:49 pm

So its null and void.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby bill cobbett » Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:06 pm

Viewpoint wrote:So its null and void.


You and your mate Rough seem to think so.
User avatar
bill cobbett
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15759
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Embargoed from Kyrenia by Jurkish Army and Genocided (many times) by Thieving, Brain-Washed Lordo

Postby boulio » Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:15 pm

Look VP IF AGREEMNTS are binding or not from 35 years ago is not the point ,the ROC IS Willing to accept trade regualtions for the t/c community thru famagusta to the A market of 500 million people in return for varosia.IF you dont like it than reject it but dont run around europe saing that you are isolated and the embargos are destroying your community. You have the oppurtunity to have direct trade its up to the turks and the t/c community to accept it.
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby Viewpoint » Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:20 pm

boulio wrote:Look VP IF AGREEMNTS are binding or not from 35 years ago is not the point ,the ROC IS Willing to accept trade regualtions for the t/c community thru famagusta to the A market of 500 million people in return for varosia.IF you dont like it than reject it but dont run around europe saing that you are isolated and the embargos are destroying your community. You have the oppurtunity to have direct trade its up to the turks and the t/c community to accept it.


We do not think it is a fair deal thats why we did reject it.

We can do what we wish after that, we are a party and have every right to put our views across on every platform we see fit.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby ZoC » Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:30 pm

Viewpoint wrote:
boulio wrote:Look VP IF AGREEMNTS are binding or not from 35 years ago is not the point ,the ROC IS Willing to accept trade regualtions for the t/c community thru famagusta to the A market of 500 million people in return for varosia.IF you dont like it than reject it but dont run around europe saing that you are isolated and the embargos are destroying your community. You have the oppurtunity to have direct trade its up to the turks and the t/c community to accept it.


We do not think it is a fair deal thats why we did reject it.

We can do what we wish after that, we are a party and have every right to put our views across on every platform we see fit.


thing is, vp, ur willy's so tiny, no one takes ur we-we seriously.
User avatar
ZoC
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3280
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:29 pm

Postby Viewpoint » Fri Apr 08, 2011 7:40 pm

ZoC wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:
boulio wrote:Look VP IF AGREEMNTS are binding or not from 35 years ago is not the point ,the ROC IS Willing to accept trade regualtions for the t/c community thru famagusta to the A market of 500 million people in return for varosia.IF you dont like it than reject it but dont run around europe saing that you are isolated and the embargos are destroying your community. You have the oppurtunity to have direct trade its up to the turks and the t/c community to accept it.


We do not think it is a fair deal thats why we did reject it.

We can do what we wish after that, we are a party and have every right to put our views across on every platform we see fit.


thing is, vp, ur willy's so tiny, no one takes ur we-we seriously.


:lol: what a moron.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests