Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu now that we have established that private land ownership rights and state soverigbty are two different matters, let me ask you a simple question do TCs have soverignty rights in any shape or form? And if they do what happens if those rights are interfered with manipulated or in fact taken away and not returned? Try and keep it directly focused and to the point as loads and loads of paragraphs only confirms you trying to cloud the issue, in laymans terms its called bullshitting.
In keeping with your request to keep my answer short, my answer is I cannot answer in simple terms since not everything is so simple as you would like them to be, and, for starters you have asked at least 4 questions all tied into one which would require a lengthy answers, which you don't want.
VP, in the future, if you are only interested in a YES/NO or single liners for an answer to complicated questions, please ask them on the 44 forum, since that's what they are really good at, they dealing in simplicity with their questions/answers, as long as you are not expecting to have answers to your questions. If you don't want your questions answered properly and in proper contexts, then please don't ask them. It takes me much longer to write them than it does for you to read them. If it's too much trouble for you to read the answers to your questions, then I rather not bother to write them in the first place if you ONLY want simplistic answers, which may not be so simple to answer, just because the question was not a simple one to begin with.!
This is your right, if you are unable to be precise and feel restricted by giving clear and unbiased answers without clouding the issue to benefit the GCs then its crystal that you are afraid god forbid that you just might have said something in favour of the TCs but you do not want to do this, do you? as it would make you physically ill, so as you said dont bother we all know where you stand, squarely in the GC camp.
Viewpoint wrote:NEVERSAYNEVER wrote:Maybe he stands for justice , democracy and fair play !
He stands for whatever benefits the GCs without taking into consideration the TCs.
Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu now that we have established that private land ownership rights and state soverigbty are two different matters, let me ask you a simple question do TCs have soverignty rights in any shape or form? And if they do what happens if those rights are interfered with manipulated or in fact taken away and not returned? Try and keep it directly focused and to the point as loads and loads of paragraphs only confirms you trying to cloud the issue, in laymans terms its called bullshitting.
In keeping with your request to keep my answer short, my answer is I cannot answer in simple terms since not everything is so simple as you would like them to be, and, for starters you have asked at least 4 questions all tied into one which would require a lengthy answers, which you don't want.
VP, in the future, if you are only interested in a YES/NO or single liners for an answer to complicated questions, please ask them on the 44 forum, since that's what they are really good at, they dealing in simplicity with their questions/answers, as long as you are not expecting to have answers to your questions. If you don't want your questions answered properly and in proper contexts, then please don't ask them. It takes me much longer to write them than it does for you to read them. If it's too much trouble for you to read the answers to your questions, then I rather not bother to write them in the first place if you ONLY want simplistic answers, which may not be so simple to answer, just because the question was not a simple one to begin with.!
This is your right, if you are unable to be precise and feel restricted by giving clear and unbiased answers without clouding the issue to benefit the GCs then its crystal that you are afraid god forbid that you just might have said something in favour of the TCs but you do not want to do this, do you? as it would make you physically ill, so as you said dont bother we all know where you stand, squarely in the GC camp.
I've already given something in favour of the TCs.
I hope that was a short enough answer for you.
Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu now that we have established that private land ownership rights and state soverigbty are two different matters, let me ask you a simple question do TCs have soverignty rights in any shape or form? And if they do what happens if those rights are interfered with manipulated or in fact taken away and not returned? Try and keep it directly focused and to the point as loads and loads of paragraphs only confirms you trying to cloud the issue, in laymans terms its called bullshitting.
In keeping with your request to keep my answer short, my answer is I cannot answer in simple terms since not everything is so simple as you would like them to be, and, for starters you have asked at least 4 questions all tied into one which would require a lengthy answers, which you don't want.
VP, in the future, if you are only interested in a YES/NO or single liners for an answer to complicated questions, please ask them on the 44 forum, since that's what they are really good at, they dealing in simplicity with their questions/answers, as long as you are not expecting to have answers to your questions. If you don't want your questions answered properly and in proper contexts, then please don't ask them. It takes me much longer to write them than it does for you to read them. If it's too much trouble for you to read the answers to your questions, then I rather not bother to write them in the first place if you ONLY want simplistic answers, which may not be so simple to answer, just because the question was not a simple one to begin with.!
This is your right, if you are unable to be precise and feel restricted by giving clear and unbiased answers without clouding the issue to benefit the GCs then its crystal that you are afraid god forbid that you just might have said something in favour of the TCs but you do not want to do this, do you? as it would make you physically ill, so as you said dont bother we all know where you stand, squarely in the GC camp.
I've already given something in favour of the TCs.
I hope that was a short enough answer for you.
If a disguised death sentence is your idea of favouring the TCs forget it.
Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu now that we have established that private land ownership rights and state soverigbty are two different matters, let me ask you a simple question do TCs have soverignty rights in any shape or form? And if they do what happens if those rights are interfered with manipulated or in fact taken away and not returned? Try and keep it directly focused and to the point as loads and loads of paragraphs only confirms you trying to cloud the issue, in laymans terms its called bullshitting.
In keeping with your request to keep my answer short, my answer is I cannot answer in simple terms since not everything is so simple as you would like them to be, and, for starters you have asked at least 4 questions all tied into one which would require a lengthy answers, which you don't want.
VP, in the future, if you are only interested in a YES/NO or single liners for an answer to complicated questions, please ask them on the 44 forum, since that's what they are really good at, they dealing in simplicity with their questions/answers, as long as you are not expecting to have answers to your questions. If you don't want your questions answered properly and in proper contexts, then please don't ask them. It takes me much longer to write them than it does for you to read them. If it's too much trouble for you to read the answers to your questions, then I rather not bother to write them in the first place if you ONLY want simplistic answers, which may not be so simple to answer, just because the question was not a simple one to begin with.!
This is your right, if you are unable to be precise and feel restricted by giving clear and unbiased answers without clouding the issue to benefit the GCs then its crystal that you are afraid god forbid that you just might have said something in favour of the TCs but you do not want to do this, do you? as it would make you physically ill, so as you said dont bother we all know where you stand, squarely in the GC camp.
I've already given something in favour of the TCs.
I hope that was a short enough answer for you.
If a disguised death sentence is your idea of favouring the TCs forget it.
ZoC wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu now that we have established that private land ownership rights and state soverigbty are two different matters, let me ask you a simple question do TCs have soverignty rights in any shape or form? And if they do what happens if those rights are interfered with manipulated or in fact taken away and not returned? Try and keep it directly focused and to the point as loads and loads of paragraphs only confirms you trying to cloud the issue, in laymans terms its called bullshitting.
In keeping with your request to keep my answer short, my answer is I cannot answer in simple terms since not everything is so simple as you would like them to be, and, for starters you have asked at least 4 questions all tied into one which would require a lengthy answers, which you don't want.
VP, in the future, if you are only interested in a YES/NO or single liners for an answer to complicated questions, please ask them on the 44 forum, since that's what they are really good at, they dealing in simplicity with their questions/answers, as long as you are not expecting to have answers to your questions. If you don't want your questions answered properly and in proper contexts, then please don't ask them. It takes me much longer to write them than it does for you to read them. If it's too much trouble for you to read the answers to your questions, then I rather not bother to write them in the first place if you ONLY want simplistic answers, which may not be so simple to answer, just because the question was not a simple one to begin with.!
This is your right, if you are unable to be precise and feel restricted by giving clear and unbiased answers without clouding the issue to benefit the GCs then its crystal that you are afraid god forbid that you just might have said something in favour of the TCs but you do not want to do this, do you? as it would make you physically ill, so as you said dont bother we all know where you stand, squarely in the GC camp.
I've already given something in favour of the TCs.
I hope that was a short enough answer for you.
If a disguised death sentence is your idea of favouring the TCs forget it.
ur right. how about we tie ur limbs to the spokes of a large wooden wheel; then we slowly turn the wheel and smash ur limbs one by one with an iron hammer, breaking them in many places. then we place the wheel on a tall pole so birds can pick at and eat ur flesh instead?
Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Kikapu now that we have established that private land ownership rights and state soverigbty are two different matters, let me ask you a simple question do TCs have soverignty rights in any shape or form? And if they do what happens if those rights are interfered with manipulated or in fact taken away and not returned? Try and keep it directly focused and to the point as loads and loads of paragraphs only confirms you trying to cloud the issue, in laymans terms its called bullshitting.
In keeping with your request to keep my answer short, my answer is I cannot answer in simple terms since not everything is so simple as you would like them to be, and, for starters you have asked at least 4 questions all tied into one which would require a lengthy answers, which you don't want.
VP, in the future, if you are only interested in a YES/NO or single liners for an answer to complicated questions, please ask them on the 44 forum, since that's what they are really good at, they dealing in simplicity with their questions/answers, as long as you are not expecting to have answers to your questions. If you don't want your questions answered properly and in proper contexts, then please don't ask them. It takes me much longer to write them than it does for you to read them. If it's too much trouble for you to read the answers to your questions, then I rather not bother to write them in the first place if you ONLY want simplistic answers, which may not be so simple to answer, just because the question was not a simple one to begin with.!
This is your right, if you are unable to be precise and feel restricted by giving clear and unbiased answers without clouding the issue to benefit the GCs then its crystal that you are afraid god forbid that you just might have said something in favour of the TCs but you do not want to do this, do you? as it would make you physically ill, so as you said dont bother we all know where you stand, squarely in the GC camp.
I've already given something in favour of the TCs.
I hope that was a short enough answer for you.
If a disguised death sentence is your idea of favouring the TCs forget it.
You ought to take up being a stand-up comic.!
Viewpoint wrote:ZoC wrote:
ur right. how about we tie ur limbs to the spokes of a large wooden wheel; then we slowly turn the wheel and smash ur limbs one by one with an iron hammer, breaking them in many places. then we place the wheel on a tall pole so birds can pick at and eat ur flesh instead?
GC democracy for everyone to see, thank you for confirming you still harbour these feeling towards TCs who oppose your dream of turning the whole of Cyprus into a Greek island and forcing us to live as a minority under GC dominance.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest