Nikitas wrote:50-50 can have many interpretations. Let us take one example recently unveiled by Eroglu over the properties issue. In the north the GC properties have been nationalised, so that, according to Eroglu, resollves the issue there. In the south, he said, the TC properties have come under the administration of the TC Properties Trustee and their ownership is traceable, therefore, according to Eroglua always, these properties should be developed jointly by the Properties Development Corporation in which TCs and GCs participate equally.
If this is the 50-50 you have in mind VP you can appreciate that you are looking for big time fools to join in. My approach is practical and I am always looking for a real life illustration of what people mean when they pretend to be expressing principles. Eroglu's view of 50-50 obviously refers to others' property. His own bit is always 100 per cent his.
Now honestly, would you go along with such a proposal? Really?
Im sure theres more to what Eroglu said than what you make out, those whos properties have been utilized will be compensated, those that have not will be returned.
Cant two sides be equal partners this does not mean everthing will be split down the middle every situation or issue will be evaluated on its own merits but both sides should have an equal say.
