Cyprus-Forum.com

[Kikapu]

i said not unite

But you said you wanted the trade embargos lifted as this would be a step towards unification. Now you are saying you don't want unification anyway. So what is it you want?

He wants the Annan Plan, which is/was a disguised partition plan. Just like what my cousin's husband said to me, that people like him and VP voted for the AP and not for peace, because it's the only way to keep most of the stolen "spoils of war", be in the EU and give Turkey control over the whole island. That's why any Fair and Just settlement is rejected by the likes of VP. It's not peace that they are after, but a large piece of Cyprus, and the proof is very clear, is when VP rejected this plan (link below) when it gave him everything he wanted, except for partition. So everyone is wasting their time, including me, to try and convince people like VP to unify, because what they want is partition as a first choice, second choice and third and final choice, as long as Turkey allows that to happen. Only when Turkey makes a 180° turn from it's present position is when there will be peace, regardless what people like VP thinks or wants.



"Kikapu's "BBF" Power Sharing Plan.!"

http://www.cyprus-forum.com/viewtopic.php?t=21685

[repulsewarrior]

...nor my manifesto!

...it is hard to imagine vp wanting equality; for wanting vp wants more.

...would you vote in a country called Cyprus as an equal for a federal Government of State, if, in a National Assembly (like others, no different in their Rights), as a Majority you could provide equally for Minorities (within your Territorial Jurisdiction) and their own special needs as well?

count them vp; not two: three(or more) governances...

...that's Bicommunal.

[Viewpoint]

i said not unite

But you said you wanted the trade embargos lifted as this would be a step towards unification. Now you are saying you don't want unification anyway. So what is it you want?

For those that do plus you are taking things out of context you asked how lifting embargoes can keep tcs interested in unification. I personally thanks to this forum understand that we can never unite the chasm is to wide and getting wider, whats animperativefor gcs is seen as a big disadvantage to tcs. There is absolutely no trust that allows tollerance understanding and compromise.

[ZoC]

There is absolutely no trust that allows tollerance understanding and compromise.

there's certainly f- all from u.

[Viewpoint]

There is absolutely no trust that allows tollerance understanding and compromise.

there's certainly f- all from u.

even less from you.

[ZoC]

There is absolutely no trust that allows tollerance understanding and compromise.

there's certainly f- all from u.

even less from you.

u first.
(although i dispute this)

[Viewpoint]

There is absolutely no trust that allows tollerance understanding and compromise.

there's certainly f- all from u.

even less from you.

u first.
(although i dispute this)

first what?

[NEVERSAYNEVER]

VP , would you honestly say that your views are representative of the vast majority of the T/Cs ?
I think not Sir .

[ZoC]

There is absolutely no trust that allows tollerance understanding and compromise.

there's certainly f- all from u.

even less from you.

u first.
(although i dispute this)

first what?

ur such a numbskull.

[Viewpoint]

VP , would you honestly say that your views are representative of the vast majority of the T/Cs ?
I think not Sir .

Definitely.