Paphitis wrote:Get Real! wrote:Bananiot wrote:For a tiny country we have produced a disproportionately large number of forumers suffering from delusions of grandeur, or to use a fine Greek word, megalomania.
The most acute case of this incurable disease is suffered by GR who comes second only to the late Archbishop Makarios, the Paphos village-boy who believed he had become a world statesman, after he was elected president and could play politics with the big boys of the world.
We are still suffering the political consequences of this megalomaniac’s folly, even though many of our countrymen have never stopped believing the myth of his greatness that he cultivated during his autocratic rule with the assistance of self-serving brown-nosers and gullible simpletons.
The above is paraphrasing Patroklos from the newspaper all bash patriots love to hate.
Problem is, I’m the one behaving in accordance with human nature in line with the masses, but how do you explain your bizarre attitude?
Luckily, someone was kind enough to define your suffering so that we may have a better chance at understanding you…
Defeatism is acceptance of defeat without struggle. In everyday use, defeatism has negative connotation and is often linked to treason and pessimism, or even a hopeless situation such as a Catch-22. The term is commonly used in the context of war: a soldier can be a defeatist if he or she refuses to fight because he or she thinks that the fight will be lost for sure or that it is not worth fighting for some other reason. Again in connection with war, the term is used to refer to the view that defeat would be better than victory.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defeatism
OK I will have to agree with you here.
Defeatism will only lead to defeat.
Unfortunately, Bananiot is not alone. I would say that most Cypriots are defeatist, including their Governments.
Please note that this does not mean starting any wars at this point in time, because that would more than likely be the same as suicide.
Don't mean to ruin your childish parade, but any sane person will come to the same conclusion without being defeatist.
Paphiti
Had most Cypriots been defeatist they would have voted for the first plan that was offered to them, they didn't.
Approximately 70%of the population would not be involved in an armed struggle against a "then" superpower. Teenagers would fight in the streets with rocks, girls would carry weapons in their baskets and men would fight with guns in the mountains.
There would not be a NG. What would have been the point against the 2nd largest army in NATO. And yet we all serve with the words "molon labe" going through our heads. Some are so far off defeatism that they support the idea of an armed struggle against a trapped occupation army on the island. GR is not the only one here, I have 3 sirades 2 of them junior officers one serves as a T80 commander, one as a LOk and one is an OYK. They all hold a widely accepted view within those branches of the military that we're wasting our time and that we should strike soon as we have naval support cutting the island off. As in the pyrovoliko take a more relaxed view on this depending on a few upgrades we've been promised next year.
Another reason I wouldn't call this nation a defeated one is the speed in which we rebuilt the island, the economy and our lives after the invasion. English stoicness Kai malakies, the Cypriots all pulled together and until Vasillious presidency it was considered offensive to strike due to the damage done to the collective effort to built up the economy. Compare us to the Greeks here that in modern times have never worked toegether in a common goal ( swan song with the Nazis and then they fell apart into the many different left and right tribes.)
I would go as far as saying that most countries would have evacuated the entire island after withstanding the attack that we did in 74. We did'nt, we armed ourselves like porcupines, focused on making money and as a people were not fooled by defeatist plans presented to us by the entire world as our only salvation.
That's not defeatist, stupid maybe but definitely not defeatist.