Cyprus-Forum.com

[boulio]

who promotes them today ?

[antifon]

who promotes them today ?

I am

http://antifon.blogspot.com/2010/12/pre ... osals.html

.

[boulio]

im talking about a official position,as of this moment all anyone is promoting is from the g/c side a federation and from the turkish/t/c side confederation.

[DTA]

Antifon no is the firm answer, bbf is the least that the tcs will accept and I assume the same about the gc side. Bbf is a compromise for both sides - and therefore in the most simplistic of terms (obviously depending on the agreements) is a fair compromise.

[antifon]

im talking about a official position,as of this moment all anyone is promoting is from the g/c side a federation and from the turkish/t/c side confederation.

No one wishes to take the blame for moving away from the 77/79 basis. Thus the answer to your question is no one. Not yet anyway!

.

[boulio]

what are your thoughts AND points of a fair bbf DTA?

[antifon]

Antifon no is the firm answer, bbf is the least that the tcs will accept and I assume the same about the gc side. Bbf is a compromise for both sides - and therefore in the most simplistic of terms (obviously depending on the agreements) is a fair compromise.

If one judges 1974 was fair then I guess you would be right. BBF is the wrong basis because 1974 was an uncalled for crime which has been left unpunished to this date. I predict not for much longer.

1963 is the right solution for both tCypriots and gCypriots. Not for Turkey. Nor for the UK perhaps.

I will even dare say that it is also a fair basis for the solution to Turkey's 87-year long problem with her own ethnic minority (25%) of Kurds.
Read more >>
http://antifon.blogspot.com/2011/03/win ... n-win.html

.

[antifon]

Antifon no is the firm answer, bbf is the least that the tcs will accept and I assume the same about the gc side. Bbf is a compromise for both sides - and therefore in the most simplistic of terms (obviously depending on the agreements) is a fair compromise.

The truth is tCypriots are running out of options. They won't have the luxury of dictating to the 90% majority of Cyprus for much longer. Realities will soon force them to what has been their best option all along: a 1963 based unitary based solution, member of the EU!

.

[Viewpoint]

Antifon no is the firm answer, bbf is the least that the tcs will accept and I assume the same about the gc side. Bbf is a compromise for both sides - and therefore in the most simplistic of terms (obviously depending on the agreements) is a fair compromise.

The truth is tCypriots are running out of options. They won't have the luxury of dictating to the 90% majority of Cyprus for much longer. Realities will soon force them to what has been their best option all along: a 1963 based unitary based solution, member of the EU!

.

We will take our chances.

[ZoC]

Antifon no is the firm answer, bbf is the least that the tcs will accept and I assume the same about the gc side. Bbf is a compromise for both sides - and therefore in the most simplistic of terms (obviously depending on the agreements) is a fair compromise.

The truth is tCypriots are running out of options. They won't have the luxury of dictating to the 90% majority of Cyprus for much longer. Realities will soon force them to what has been their best option all along: a 1963 based unitary based solution, member of the EU!

.

We will take our chances.

thats all u know. take! take! take!