Cyprus-Forum.com

by **DTA** » Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:30 pm

boulio wrote:karpasia is a big non starter as well,there were many other issues for the g/c no as well,virgin birth,the fact that the turkish parliment had to vote on this plan after the roc would be replaced by the uroc,british AOZ,property isseues(33% would be returned the other part would be compensated by the same individuals)

Im looking for points on convergence, although I think this thread has taught me a few things like I have already pointed out that as to why the plan was unfeasible.

by **Viewpoint** » Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:33 pm

You lost the only chance you will ever get.

by **DTA** » Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:33 pm

Bananiot wrote:No doubt Klerides is an honourable guy, the best statesman that came out of Cyprus.

I am terrible with spelling in general (Dyslexia) and worse with names, but i will make an effort to remember how Klerides is spelt

by **Bananiot** » Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:36 pm

No worries, Einstein was dyslexic ... but some spell it with a C, I am not sure which is the correct one - Clerides.

by **quattro** » Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:36 pm

Viewpoint wrote:You lost the only chance you will ever get.

Keep dreaming :shock:

by **DTA** » Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:36 pm

Viewpoint wrote:You lost the only chance you will ever get.

That maybe the case VP but what do you think about the GCs not being allowed to buy land in the North or population caps of 6% if these are true then they would be quite plainly wrong dont you think?

by **quattro** » Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:38 pm

DTA wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:You lost the only chance you will ever get.

That maybe the case VP but what do you think about the GCs not being allowed to buy land in the North or population caps of 6% if these are true then they would be quite plainly wrong dont you think?

DTA for VP even the 37% is not enough :roll:

by **Viewpoint** » Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:39 pm

Being in the EU these would have soon been eroded add to this a building of understanding and trust we would soon have had no need.

by **Viewpoint** » Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:41 pm

quattro wrote:
DTA wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:You lost the only chance you will ever get.

That maybe the case VP but what do you think about the GCs not being allowed to buy land in the North or population caps of 6% if these are true then they would be quite plainly wrong dont you think?

DTA for VP even the 37% is not enough

where did you derive that idea?

by **boulio** » Tue Mar 01, 2011 11:43 pm

i think if they stuck with annan 3 and polished it a bit not so much to g/c demands but for of a european norms and laws you probably would have gotten a yes.

Cyprus-Forum.com

The Annan plan

Who is online