For some time talks were going on between the Greek and Turkish Cypriots in search of a peaceful solution to the Cyprus problem, which on many occasions has occupied the time of the Security Council and the General Assembly of the United Nations. The representative of the Secretary General and two constitutional experts from Greece and Turkey have been attending the talks. The Security Council has repeatedly renewed, twice yearly, the mandate of the peace-keeping force in Cyprus, expressing every time hope for a speedy solution of the problem.
It cannot be said that up to now the progress of the talks has been satisfactory. But how could there be any progress in the talks while the policy on Cyprus of the regime in Athens has been double-faced? It was agreed by all the parties concerned that the talks were taking place on the basis of independence. The regime of Athens also agreed to that, and time and again the Greek Ministry of Foreign Affairs declared that the position of Greece on this issue was clear. If that were the case, why had the military regime of Greece created and supported the terrorist organisation 'EOKA B', whose purpose was stated to be the union of Cyprus with Greece and whose members called themselves 'unionists'?
Natty wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Hermes wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Can we have your views on what the TCs suffered both in 1963 and 1974 the knife cuts both ways.
My view is that Turkish Cypriots' mistake has been to allow themselves to be used as proxies for Turkish strategic interests both in the 1960s and in 1974. In doing so, they have debased themselves and become morally corrupted in the process. Their degradation is the result of their own moral weakness and entirely self-inflicted.
In the face of enosis what did you expect that they support their own death warrant.
Typical scare tactics. Keep people in a state of constant fear, make them believe that your way is the best (namely occupation and partition), that only you can truly protect them. There is no alternative, unless you want to sign your own death warrant. Brilliant, truly inspired.1155. Again, if the purpose of a settlement of the Cyprus question is to be the
preservation rather than the destruction of the State, and if it is to foster
rather than to militate against the development of a peacefully united people, I
cannot help wondering whether the physical division of the minority from the
majority should not be considered a desperate step in the wrong direction. I am
reluctant to believe, as the Turkish-Cypriot leadership claims, in the
"impossibility" of Greek-Cypriots and Turkish-Cypriots learning to live together
again in peace. In those parts of the country where movement controls have been
relaxed and tensions reduced, they are already proving otherwise.
http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/at ... 0S6253.pdf
Get Real! wrote:Klik wrote:ΕΘΝΙΚΗ... when did Cyprus become an Ethnos?
What the hell is that?![]()
No such word exists in English.
Klik wrote:Get Real! wrote:Klik wrote:ΕΘΝΙΚΗ... when did Cyprus become an Ethnos?
What the hell is that?![]()
No such word exists in English.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnos
Ethnic group derives from that word in case you didn't know it. And it's the FORMAL way of saying ethnic group...
Get Real! wrote:Klik wrote:Get Real! wrote:Klik wrote:ΕΘΝΙΚΗ... when did Cyprus become an Ethnos?
What the hell is that?![]()
No such word exists in English.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnos
Ethnic group derives from that word in case you didn't know it. And it's the FORMAL way of saying ethnic group...
Manufactured nonsense! No such word exists!![]()
??? So Cypriots are not an ethnic group?![]()
What are they an alien group?
Natty wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Hermes wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Can we have your views on what the TCs suffered both in 1963 and 1974 the knife cuts both ways.
My view is that Turkish Cypriots' mistake has been to allow themselves to be used as proxies for Turkish strategic interests both in the 1960s and in 1974. In doing so, they have debased themselves and become morally corrupted in the process. Their degradation is the result of their own moral weakness and entirely self-inflicted.
In the face of enosis what did you expect that they support their own death warrant.
Typical scare tactics. Keep people in a state of constant fear, make them believe that your way is the best (namely occupation and partition), that only you can truly protect them. There is no alternative, unless you want to sign your own death warrant. Brilliant, truly inspired.1155. Again, if the purpose of a settlement of the Cyprus question is to be the
preservation rather than the destruction of the State, and if it is to foster
rather than to militate against the development of a peacefully united people, I
cannot help wondering whether the physical division of the minority from the
majority should not be considered a desperate step in the wrong direction. I am
reluctant to believe, as the Turkish-Cypriot leadership claims, in the
"impossibility" of Greek-Cypriots and Turkish-Cypriots learning to live together
again in peace. In those parts of the country where movement controls have been
relaxed and tensions reduced, they are already proving otherwise.
http://www.securitycouncilreport.org/at ... 0S6253.pdf
Get Real! wrote:Klik wrote:Get Real! wrote:Klik wrote:ΕΘΝΙΚΗ... when did Cyprus become an Ethnos?
What the hell is that?![]()
No such word exists in English.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnos
Ethnic group derives from that word in case you didn't know it. And it's the FORMAL way of saying ethnic group...
Manufactured nonsense! No such word exists!![]()
??? So Cypriots are not an ethnic group?![]()
What are they an alien group?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests