Nikitas wrote:Just saw Eroglu's proposals for power sharing. They include spearate sovereignty for each constituent state, the power of each to sign internatioanl agreements, the continued guarantees of BOTH states by Turkey, Greece and UK, and a proviso which really is cute: in the event of one state leaving the union it will not remove the satus of the other state.
I would love to hear Bananiot's interpretation of these proposals. No doubt there will be the usual "each new proposal is worse than the last one, it is our fault for not accepting the last one". To which the counter is that the new proposal shows us what the Eroglus had in mind when we were discussing the last one.
While we talk BBF and such bullshit they are really talking partition. IF partition is on the table then let us call it by its name and stop the crap about unitary states and federal structures. Negotiating partition openly and realistically puts a whole different slant on things and changes the international situation radically. Using the word reunification to disguise it obviously helps the invader.
Who is fooling who in this idiotic game anyway?
Nikita, you have just stated we we all know already. Save your breath with Bananiotoglu, for there is no action the GCs can take to please him, other than accept everything the Turks place before us.
To him we will always be racists, facists, cretins and rejectionists, because we keep rejecting every shit of a plan to rob us of our own country. As far as Bananiotoglu is concerned, as long as his Turkish mates are sorted, he couldn't give a shit about the GC comminity.
All the same, a good post. btw, do you have a link to where Mr E. made that statement? Are those his actual words?