Cyprus-Forum.com

[Simon]

Scientifically I think you just got owned GR.

Cap, GR gets owned every time he opens one of these threads. He seems to open a new one regurgitating the same stuff every few months, simply ignoring the evidence and compelling arguments against him. It's boring now.

Sure brings you out of the woodwork doesn't it Simon?

Only to twist the knife GR!

I give meaning to your miserable Greek life… just kiss my feet and go!

I'm not sure about meaning, but you sure provide entertainment!

[Get Real!]

How come nobody posted the Pontikos DNA "research" yet?

You know, the one that concludes with…

“You are NOT Slavs! You are directly linked with ancient Greeks!”

The next day, the usually ignored and laughed at man received much needed funding from the Greek government!

[Oracle]

Scientifically I think you just got owned GR.

The similarities are astonishing!

Any non-related group will show exactly the same. The Greeks are no more related to any of those "Slavic" groups than any other group would be. They are heterogeneous and you prove that by picking some similarities from one group and some from another; but that's not how Group similarities work. All or nothing! So, your whole premise is wrong otherwise all the groups would have been homogeneous or the Greeks would have erred towards one or another - not this way and that!

[Klik]

Facebook?

If you dig well enough you'll find that. The summary was not written by Stanford University nor University of Pavia. So good luck finding the original. I have it in a magazine at home btw, key words is Stanford...

[Oracle]

At most, the Greeks show no more than one or two close (but no exact matches) similarities to any one group. That proves they are different groups. Considering they are such close neighbours, one would expect greater similarities.

[Get Real!]

Scientifically I think you just got owned GR.

The similarities are astonishing!

Any non-related group will show exactly the same. The Greeks are no more related to any of those "Slavic" groups than any other group would be. They are heterogeneous and you prove that by picking some similarities from one group and some from another; but that's not how Group similarities work. All or nothing! So, your whole premise is wrong otherwise all the groups would have been homogeneous or the Greeks would have erred towards one or another - not this way and that!

And the similarity results are…

Albanians: 3/5
Kosovars: 1/5
Macedonians: 2/5
Serbs: 2/5

What a lovely Slavic mix you are…

[Klik]

Scientifically I think you just got owned GR.

The similarities are astonishing!

Any non-related group will show exactly the same. The Greeks are no more related to any of those "Slavic" groups than any other group would be. They are heterogeneous and you prove that by picking some similarities from one group and some from another; but that's not how Group similarities work. All or nothing! So, your whole premise is wrong otherwise all the groups would have been homogeneous or the Greeks would have erred towards one or another - not this way and that!

And the similarity results are…

Albanians: 3/5
Kosovars: 1/5
Macedonians: 2/5
Serbs: 2/5

What a lovely Slavic mix you are…

for real?


Macedonians have 5/5 similarity with Greeks coz they are Greeks... You probably meant Bulgaro-Serbs

[Bananiot]

It is a well known fact that modern Greeks have nothing to do with ancient Greeks. You do not even have to look at their DNA to establish this. Just listen to them on the talk shows on Greek tv. They are more than barbaric in their manners and of course the corruption that exists since the establishment of the Greek nation in 1828 pays testament to the fact that these people have nothing in common with the ancients.

Look at all these misanthropists of the forum too. They claim to be direct descendants of Socrates but in reality they have always been miserable, xenophobic, racist retards. These are no attributes of the ancient Greeks, who elevated "Xenios Zeus" into the grand god that protected xenous (foreigners) from the sharp teeth of the oracles of this world.



Xenios Zeus

[Oracle]

Scientifically I think you just got owned GR.

The similarities are astonishing!

Any non-related group will show exactly the same. The Greeks are no more related to any of those "Slavic" groups than any other group would be. They are heterogeneous and you prove that by picking some similarities from one group and some from another; but that's not how Group similarities work. All or nothing! So, your whole premise is wrong otherwise all the groups would have been homogeneous or the Greeks would have erred towards one or another - not this way and that!

And the similarity results are…

Albanians: 3/5
Kosovars: 1/5
Macedonians: 2/5
Serbs: 2/5

What a lovely Slavic mix you are…

Re: Albanians: 5% difference over 17 to 22% is not a SIMILARITY! Ditto for your next one at 6%

You've basically found that the baseline relatedness of any two non-related groups is one to two similarities - as I said! So, they are heterogeneous groups.

[Klik]

http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2004/ ... e.research

From 2004... In 2005 Stanford & Pavia university confirmed that most Greeks derived from their ancient ancestors.

Perhaps that's also due to the fact that since Greeks fucked about everything that was moving from the Far East to the Far West, the Greek DNA was pretty much everywhere... therefore the DNA might be Greek but doesn't mean that everyone was Greek, in terms of language, ethnic group etc... Coptic Egyptians are pretty much offspring of Greeks that lived in Egypt for a long period of time and that doesn't mean that there's no 'bastard' blood as well.

Get Real!, I'll ask you again to do what your nickname suggests....

http://www.dnaancestryproject.com/

Let's just all participate here instead of have useless arguments