Oracle wrote:denizaksulu wrote:Oracle wrote:denizaksulu wrote: ... .but then the GC extremists did behave in a manner that 'invited' the Turks to 'invade'.
Do you actually believe this or do you believe this is what the Turks wanted you to believe?
The anti Makarios coup was an 'invitation' wasnt it? No one can make me believe anything that I know is wrong.
Why don't you stick your neck out and admit that when the GCs were having a civil dispute you chose to opportunistically invade for your piece!
The Turks had been anti Enosis since about 1955 - they apparently provided ex-officers as the core of TMT and promoted Takism. That was a contriburory facto to the establishment of an independant Cyprus, rather than the absorbtion of Cyprus into Greece by Enosis.
As it was, the 1974 Coup was not a GC civil dispute: it was war promoted by a Foreign state, Greecem using Greek Troops called invaders by Big Mak.
For what ever reason (and I think bioth TC and GC are guilty, neither Enosis nor Takism died in 1960 - indeed Enosis was revived in 1963 wth the 13 points and Acritas Plan, and promoted certainly up to 1967/8, ( and Takism re-emerged at about the same time. I understand that Turkey was pursuaded NOT to invade several times by the USA: then the Junta came along - in 1974 they decided to Annex Cyprus, by inspring the 1974 Coup, which involved participation of Greek Forces on the Island: that coup, described by Big Mak as an invasion by Greece, was all the invitation the Turks then needed to invade to "save" the 1960 consitution and to allgedly protect thie T/C's, though as is reportedr, someTurkish Politicians have suggeted that in relaity did not give a toss about the TC due to their own geo-political , and invasion was a dead cert at some point if, as in 74, there was a serious risk of any form of enosis.
[/youtube]