Oracle wrote:Certainly not "Turkey"!
As long as Turkey occupies Cyprus - its other occupations will remain highlighted here, also!
try harder. You pick armenians or kurds? We all trust your deep knowledge of history come on.
Oracle wrote:Certainly not "Turkey"!
As long as Turkey occupies Cyprus - its other occupations will remain highlighted here, also!
Oracle wrote:Certainly not "Turkey"!
As long as Turkey occupies Cyprus - its other occupations will remain highlighted here, also!
denizaksulu wrote:Oracle wrote:Certainly not "Turkey"!
As long as Turkey occupies Cyprus - its other occupations will remain highlighted here, also!
Oracle dearest. Just like the RoC is Internationally recognised as the legal body and the northern admin is not; one has to look at the legal aspects of 'ownership'. The boundaries of the Republic of Turkey were recognised by the International bodies, so Turkey is the 'legal' 'owner' of Kars. I cant stop you winding our friend up, but you must see the absurdity of your claims. Or is this part of your 'Mikri Idea'
Bananiot wrote:But, the genes have mutated since, and became more ... Greek, so do the oracles of this forum believe.
supporttheunderdog wrote:denizaksulu wrote:Oracle wrote:Certainly not "Turkey"!
As long as Turkey occupies Cyprus - its other occupations will remain highlighted here, also!
Oracle dearest. Just like the RoC is Internationally recognised as the legal body and the northern admin is not; one has to look at the legal aspects of 'ownership'. The boundaries of the Republic of Turkey were recognised by the International bodies, so Turkey is the 'legal' 'owner' of Kars. I cant stop you winding our friend up, but you must see the absurdity of your claims. Or is this part of your 'Mikri Idea'
Dear Deniz
IMHO one of Oracle's problems is seeking to mix and match her perceptions of ancient historical ideas with those of the 21st Century, forgetting that (a) Greece as nation state only came about in the early 19th Century within defined boundries which did not include any part of of what is now modern Turkey and (b) the city states of the ancient world were sometimes a bit fickle in who they owed their allegience to. For example many of the Cypriot city states gave allegience over many years to the persain Empire, which only really came to an end with the Invasions and conquests of Alexander the Mecedonian.
It is otherwise seemingly quite acceptable for Greeks to become occupiers (as they did in Anatolia in ancient times, and possibly in Cyprus (though I think GR contests that, possibly with some validity) or to impose their cultural mores on the world (or at least part of it) as they probably did in ancient times but then time has to stop.
Just a pity we do not have a Tardis to allow us to ship O back to the ancient world, where she will no doubt be very happy.
supporttheunderdog wrote:Bananiot wrote:But, the genes have mutated since, and became more ... Greek, so do the oracles of this forum believe.
Mutated in about 15 years? a Miracle......
denizaksulu wrote:Oracle wrote:Certainly not "Turkey"!
As long as Turkey occupies Cyprus - its other occupations will remain highlighted here, also!
Oracle dearest. Just like the RoC is Internationally recognised as the legal body and the northern admin is not; one has to look at the legal aspects of 'ownership'. The boundaries of the Republic of Turkey were recognised by the International bodies, so Turkey is the 'legal' 'owner' of Kars. I cant stop you winding our friend up, but you must see the absurdity of your claims. Or is this part of your 'Mikri Idea'
runaway wrote:Oracle wrote:Certainly not "Turkey"!
As long as Turkey occupies Cyprus - its other occupations will remain highlighted here, also!
try harder. You pick armenians or kurds? We all trust your deep knowledge of history come on.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests