runaway wrote:Oracle wrote:runaway wrote:Oracle wrote:runaway wrote:runaway wrote:Oracle wrote:Certainly
not "Turkey"!
As long as Turkey occupies Cyprus - its other occupations will remain highlighted here, also!
try harder. You pick armenians or kurds? We all trust your deep knowledge of history come on.
But, you have not convinced me that Turkey has any right to interfere, let alone claim it as their own.
Since you pulled this place out of a hat: firstly, show me why "Turkey" has any ancestral claim to this place.
Then we can weigh up whether Georgians, Armenians or even Greeks have more claim - perhaps all three Christian countries can happily form an alliance!
I would like to
hand over Kars to its rightful owners. Tell me who that will be
So you acknowledge that "Kars" needs to be handed over, by "Turkey" to its
rightful owners!
Wonderful progress!
We have your word on this that "Kars" is NOT "Turkish".
you told us kars was armenian, then kurdish, and then armenian again, and then kurdish. Lady just tell us the rightful owner of Kars????
Kindly tell me where I made such decisions for other people?
(Remember, I warned you, last night, that you are hearing voices and debating with yourself
)
My concern is that "Turkey" should be divided up, back to the pre-Byzantine times before the Mongol invasions.
Thank you for acknowledging that these territories are NOT "Turkish". Your job is done!