The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Re: 1963 is this all propaganda if so then how?

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby boulio » Thu Dec 23, 2010 8:47 pm

boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby DTA » Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:12 pm

That was actually quite an impartial link. To be honest I was not expecting it to be impartial so shame on me. But it only gives two examples of when the vito was used and both seem reasonable to me; does it not to you?
DTA
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1241
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:25 pm
Location: LONDON

Postby boulio » Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:24 pm

veto not vito(vito is a italian in brooklyn)and how were they reasonable to you it says in the site that they vetoed the budget because of the municipalities that would be under review.so something that needed to be negotiated and looked at objectively for completely freezing the functioning of a state.i can what to see what you would consider unreasonable.
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby DTA » Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:45 pm

From your link:

"Moreover, they (gcs) complained that a Turkish-Cypriot veto on the budget (in response to alleged failures to meet obligations to the Turkish-Cypriots"

so you were failing to meet obligations so a veto was used. Big deal? And even within that we are working with the assumption that, that was the reason the veto was used, So try again.

Thanks for correcting my spelling.
DTA
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1241
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:25 pm
Location: LONDON

Postby Viewpoint » Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:46 pm

DTA wrote:From your link:

"Moreover, they (gcs) complained that a Turkish-Cypriot veto on the budget (in response to alleged failures to meet obligations to the Turkish-Cypriots"

so you were failing to meet obligations so a veto was used. Big deal? And even within that we are working with the assumption that, that was the reason the veto was used, So try again.

Thanks for correcting my spelling.


The GCs refused to adhere to a Supreme court ruling over the matter thats when all hell let loose.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby boulio » Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:59 pm

"alleged failures"did you miss that?
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby Viewpoint » Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:08 pm

boulio wrote:"alleged failures"did you miss that?


Hello can alleged by the Supreme court ruling in favour of the TCs?
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby boulio » Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:10 pm

you can also claim that the supreme court ruling was political THEN legal.espesially with a foreign judge on the bench.
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby Viewpoint » Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:19 pm

boulio wrote:you can also claim that the supreme court ruling was political THEN legal.espesially with a foreign judge on the bench.


You signed an agreement to adhere to supreme court rulings again you reneged.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby boulio » Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:28 pm

You signed an agreement to adhere to supreme court rulings again you reneged.


and turks have signed hundreds of agreements that they never adhere to in he past and present.whats your point?
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests