denizaksulu wrote:Kikapu wrote:lovernomore wrote:ZoC wrote:lovernomore wrote:Piratis wrote:Viewpoint wrote:Bir thats why i have accepted the reality that there is no hope of agreeing a solution with the south so the only alternative we have left is to stand our ground with the TRNC and fight for our right to self determination.
How does your "right" of self determination include our lands?
Self-determination means to determine your own self and what belongs to you. The north part of Cyprus does not belong to you, you are only illegally occupying it. Thats like saying that ruling France was a self-determination right of the Nazis. (and yes, there is was a German minority in France, and no, that was not an excuse for the Nazi occupation).
Look at it this way. We were married for years and had lots of properties to our names but then decided we no longer loved or cared for each other and got divorced. It is likely that the husband had contributed more financially than the wife but the courts will award the wife equal or very near to equal of all assets.
Every time I drive through The Bishops Avenue I look at Roman Abromavich's wife's mansion and think poor Roman, at £45 million that probably works out at over 100K per fuck and £50K per blow job
Another example. Paul McCartney with Heather Mills works out at around a million per lay. So Piratis, if you had behaved and respected the constitution and your fellow compatriots none of this would have happened and we would have been living happily ever after.
You can argue all you like, you can try and distort the facts all you like but it will be in vain, you've been busted, the whole world now know the truth and are beginning to accept that a divorce is inevitable and like in every divorce a fair settlement is expected. 37/63 sounds just about right to me.
ur marriage analogy is flawed. it was a shot gun wedding. the bride was an ugly, aggressive, lazy, self-serving bitch. the groom never loved her, nor even fancied her. and he can't stand her dad, who's an utter prick.
The bride was a beautiful virgin which was at your beck and call. She was obedient and loyal. You treated her like a Phillipino maid. In the end her father had to protect her daughter because her life was at risk in the hands of an unstable, drunken and abusive scum. The fathers intervention was inevitable.
Now, both families are defending their corners and looking for a fair settlement, in such cases outside intervention, arbitration is necessary as the 2 families are clearly not in a state of mind to act rationally for obvious reasons.
The un came along and offered a fair and just solution back in 2004 but to the you turned up your nose. So as I see it you guys want your cake whole and eat it too.
You are a bunch of lying, racist pigs and deserve everything you get. I pray you attempt again what you attempted in 63 and 74 and this time the father really punishes you by driving all into the Mediterranean never to be seen again.
Since you brought up the wife/husband analogy (big mistake ), there may be some issues as to whether the marriage was legal or not and whether the "wife" is entitled to anything from a divorce, since the "wife" is a Muslim.!Islamic Laws Regarding Marriage
"It is not permissible for Muslim women to marry non-Muslim men" (2 : 221 and 60:10).
"The wife, however; loses her right of maintenance, according to the unanimous opinion of the Muslim jurists, in case of Nushuz, that is her hatred or defiance of husband or her attraction to another person."
http://www.islamic-truth.co.uk/islamics ... rriage.pdf
Şeri'a law in Cyprus? Thats a new one
I know, I know, but then again, it's as close as you can get to "Sharia Law" in the north today, isn't it though. OK, the "wife" is not being stoned to death for having a "infidel" boinking her, but the "wife" is being performed a "Mercy Killing" on her by the "father". !