Afroasiatis wrote:Piratis wrote:
But maybe in the future we will be able to get our "car" back, nobody knows what the future will bring. So why not keep the keys of our car just in case and meanwhile also make the Mafia Boss suffer a bit? Since the deal the Mafia Boss is offering us today is not good enough, thats really the only logical thing to do.
What's wrong is to think at the car, and plan your life based on it. Throwing the keys away might help you to forget about it and continue your life. If you want, you can of course make the Mafia Boss suffer a bit, for getting some sort of revenge.
Of course, if you ask me, the deal that the Mafia Boss seems ready to accept isn't that bad, given the conditions, so there is no reason for throwing the keys away yet.
The same way that the Turks overcame the problems, only for us it will much easier since we would be liberating our own lands and we will already have people owning the real title deeds to the properties there.
The Turks overcame the problems by:
- Scaring off the native population through massacres, rapes etc, so making them flee. Are you planning to do the same to the future population of the North, which by then will feel as much native?
- Using the previous isolation and suffering of TCs to make them feel that it worths leaving their land and houses behind and move to the North. Are you planning to create a similar situation of pressure on a part of GC population, to make them feel unwelcomed and be ready to leave everything behind and move to the North?
- Using the bad economic situation of parts of Turkish population (I mean, from Turkey), to give them a motivation for moving in North Cyprus in search of a better future. Where are you going to find people in similar bad economic situation, in Greece?
Not much better than Annan Plan as a total, but better in some key issues which are of great importance to GCs, like the one I mentioned.
I am not sure which are the key issues you are referring to. Obviously if key issues change in a way that will be acceptable to us (e.g. land distribution, power sharing etc) then the result could be accepted. But I don't see this happening because the Turks will not accept changes to key issues, and even Christofias makes proposals (e.g. rotating presidency) which are not accepted by the majority of GCs! So I really don't see how key issues can be changed in a way that the result will be acceptable to us.
I don't think there is much chance for improvements in territory or coastline issue. Power sharing is more or less already agreed - I don't know the Annan Plan in detail to tell you if and how much it's improved, but the weighted vote is for sure a great progress, not from a GC but from a general Cypriot point of view.
Key issues in which there is a chance for improvements is, I think, the property issue (mainly clearing up the procedure, and providing guarantees), the army issue, perhaps even the guarantee treaties. The deviations from rights as applied in EU is also an area where a deal close to GC positions is possible, I believe, though I don't know how this was in Annan-Plan exactly.
You can't do anything to the Prime Minister of Turkey, but if the TC president violates the constitution, there should be a process to kick him out of his office, like I guess there is in all states based on a constitution.
First of all we would need a parameter in the constitution that would define this. But even if there is, who will decide if there is a violation and who would enforce the law. Do you envision GC policemen dragging a TC president out of the presidential palace? The TC leadership (under the direction of Turkey) could claim that the issue is humanitarian, and use this excuse to flood Cyprus with even more Turks and there would be very little we could do.
I don't quite understand the point with the humanitarian claim.
If the policemen who will drag the TC president out will be TC or GC is irrelevant - they will obey to the federal goverment. As to who will decide if there is a violation, I guess some kind of a constitutional court.
If the child thinks of you as the father instead of me and you fulfill all your functions as a father, then the question, who's the father isn't easy to answer, even if it legally belongs to me.
The "child" in this case is land. Land can't talk. So let me rephrase: If I stole your car and I keep your car illegally in my possession, does your car
belong to me? I think nobody can seriously debate that it does.
Just as the child metaphor has deficits, so does the car metaphor. Territory gained through war between countries isn't the same as a stolen car, and the value of international legality isn't the same as the laws which apply on car thefts.
You earlier admitted that TCs are not the ones who exercise real power over the north part of Cyprus. Turkey is. The TCs are just a bunch of puppets with no real power so even by using your own definition we again come to the same conclusion: There is no such "trnc" state, which is why we use this term in quotes to distinguish this pseudo state, from real states such as RoC which is the one and only state in Cyprus (and you can't have more than one real state over the same territory. On the other hand you can have as many fake states like the "PS" and the "trnc" as you want. All you need to do is to declare them)
First, the TCs are a people, they aren't puppets. There is a difference between the TC people and the TC regime. The TC regime is one higly dependent on Turkey. All states are dependent on others, there is no such thing as a really independent state, but the difference between e.g. RoC and TRNC (besides recognitions etc) is that the later is almost exclusively dependent on one and single other state.
As the English say "What's good for the goose is good for the gander" If they think that they can get the ideal solution for themselves by ethnically cleansing us then we should reciprocate and define as our ideal solution the ethnic cleansing of TCs from Cyprus which will solve all the problems for us.
Sorry, I am not Jesus Christ. If somebody insists on slapping me then I would slap him back, I will not turn the other cheek. So when the balance of power will change the Turks should know that they will get what they wanted, but in reverse.
This is what I mean by a national, instead of humanist, way of thinking. You speak of the GCs and TCs as if they are each a single body, and so a punishment can be applied to TCs collectively as a people. That's the same mentality which supported the ethnic cleansing of Sudete Germans by the Czechs, this is why I asked you why did you mention it. It is also a similar mentality with that e.g. of Hamas when it carries suicide bombings with civilian Israelis as targets.
This has nothing to do with Christian ethics, but to if you can see a people as collectively guilty for something, instead of juding their guilt as individuals.