Turkey (( * wrote:Of course it is not an excuse, and it should be improved!!But usage of human rights against Turkey is not right!!
Turkey ((* re, it's part of the Copenhagen Criteria that have applied to all recent and current applicant states. Therefore, if Turkey wants to join the EU, the human rights situation will have to change according to the EUs values. At some point in the future, I plan to write a paper on the disjuncture between Turkish values and those of the EU, pointing out the massive transition required by the Turkish state to accord with European norms. I think of any country, past and present that has desired to join the EU, Turkey will face the toughest task. The EU has evolved from a mere free-trade zone in which domestic politics was the preserve of the individual states, to a Union in which the member states have the right to criticise and seek amendment to practices in other countries. If the UK had not joined the Union when it was a mere talking shop, I think if we were in the position of applying today, we probably would look elsewhere as it does involve pooling your nation's sovereignty and for large and powerful states used to 'doing their own thing', such a sacrifice will come hard. This is the dilemma that Turkey faces today. Two choices, one to seek EU membership at all costs, which will mean a transformation of the state from its Kemalist modern form to a more post-modernist structure, or to turn its back on Europe and seek partnership elsewhere. The problem lies in that the EU is Turkey's most reliable prospective economic and political partner, so to turn their back on that would risk all the economic gains that have been secured in recent years. If Turkey is regarded by the global financial markets as potentially unstable, capital will flee the country immediately and as a result, stability and order could be threatened. If this happens in concert with the collapse of the Erdogan government, a likely consequence if EU talks failed, Turkey could find itself in some trouble.