The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Early application of divide and rule

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Get Real! » Tue Nov 23, 2010 8:06 pm

BirKibrisli wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
BirKibrisli wrote:You'd have more credibility if you used GR's term "Ottoman remnants"...

I coined that 3-4 years ago and now it’s used Cyprus wide!

And what a perfect description it is… 8)


Well,if we are Ottoman Remnants it is our historical and natural right to rule over you...So when are you going to hand over the rest of Cyprus to their rightful owners??? :wink: :)

These days it’s the clever that rule not the many, so you don’t stand a chance anymore… :lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby BirKibrisli » Wed Nov 24, 2010 1:00 am

Get Real! wrote:
BirKibrisli wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
BirKibrisli wrote:You'd have more credibility if you used GR's term "Ottoman remnants"...

I coined that 3-4 years ago and now it’s used Cyprus wide!

And what a perfect description it is… 8)


Well,if we are Ottoman Remnants it is our historical and natural right to rule over you...So when are you going to hand over the rest of Cyprus to their rightful owners??? :wink: :)

These days it’s the clever that rule not the many, so you don’t stand a chance anymore… :lol:


Sharks! :)
User avatar
BirKibrisli
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6162
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:28 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Early application of divide and rule

Postby insan » Wed Nov 24, 2010 11:51 am

Talisker wrote:
In the nineteenth century European powers employed "natives" perceived to be inherently "martial" as the mainstay of their imperial armed forces. This theory of "martial races" undergirded the composition, for example, of Britain's Indian Army. An attempt in the 1890s to apply "martial races" theory to the formation of an indigenous defence force in Cyprus, however, proved to be an unqualified failure. Although the British government claimed that the scheme fell through because of inadequate funds, the main reason was that the decision to recruit the force exclusively from among the presumably more "martial" Turkish Muslim population of the island contradicted local ideas of identity by dividing Cypriots into "Greeks" and "Turks," with unhappy consequences for the future.

Varnava, A (2010). Journal of Military History 74: 1047-1067.

First I'd heard this happened so early......


Those were the years when Scottish Rite expanded to Cyprus... Then came the "Young Turks"...

...to "unite" the world under the masonic order...

http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cac ... 9R_xwOHgZQ
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby insan » Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:05 pm

THE APHORISM AGAINST FREEMASONRY
by Cyprianus, Archbishop of Cyprus

Cyprus, February 2nd, 1815

“Wherefore, clad in the sacred vestments of epitrachelion and omophorion we say, If any man preach unto you any other gospel than that which we have'; preached unto you, even though an angel from heaven, let him be accursed.” (Gal. 1,8,9) As many as are befitting, that pursue after such a diabolic and lawless employment of Freemasonry, and all they that follow unto their infatuation and unto their error, let them be excommunicated and accursed by the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. After death, they shall be unpardoned, indissoluble, and bloated. Groaning and trembling, as Cain, shall they be upon the earth. (Gen. 4:14). The earth shall cleave and swallow them up, as Dathan and Abiram (Num. 16, 31-32). The wrath of God shall be upon their heads, and their portion together with Judas the betrayer. As angel of the Lord will prosecute them with a flaming sword and, unto their life’s termination, they will not know of progress. Let their works and toil be unblessed and let them become a cloud of dust, as of a summer threshing floor. And all they indeed that shall abide still unto their wickedness will have such a recompense. But as many as shall go out from the midst of them and shall be separated, and having spat out their abominable heresy, and shall go afar of from their accursed infatuation, such kind shall receive the wages of the zealot Phineas; rather let them be blessed and forgiven by the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Spirit, the Only unconfused and undivided Trinity, the One God in nature, and by us His servants.”

This is the APHORISM of the NATIONAL MARTYR, Cyprianus, Archbishop of Cyprus, who in the year 1821, during the Greek revolution against Turkey, shed his blood in defense of the liberty of his Greek homeland from Turkey. Likewise, Archbishop Hierotheus of Patras, Greece, published two comprehensive encyclicals against Masonry, one on October 5, 1897, and another on August 22, 1899.


http://www.trueorthodoxy.org/non_christ ... ions.shtml

... and by the way, who needed to divide the already divided? :lol:
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Previous

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests