One of the more depressing aspects of this forum is the constant sniping at 'moaning' Brits by some Cypriot forumers, telling them to 'go home if you don't like it', etc, etc. To me this smacks of oversensitivity. Cyprus being in the EU there is a raft of legislation allowing for freedom of speech for all residents of the country, amongst them the Brits. So, to suggest that criticism should be withheld by Brits living in Cyprus, or Brits outside Cyprus who have visited and have an interest in the island, is a non-starter.
I've been thinking about 'criticism' - the purpose, and culture associated with it. I've concluded that criticism is generally meant to assist an improvement to a culture or practice. The general culture in the UK is one of criticism, whether it is mild and inoffensive 'piss-taking' in all aspects of life, or much more serious and rigorous enforcement of rules and regulations, which are in place mainly for purposes of general improvement (this is, of course, debatable) of life (e.g. the raft of Health and Safety regulations, etc, etc), or as a means for quality assessment and control, again all pervasive in life here. Therefore, people complain and criticise vociferously, lead often by the media, directed at individuals (particularly those who have obtained some degree of fame for whatever reason), organisations, political parties, governments......the list is endless. But my point is that many aspects of 'criticism' or 'review' are positive and for the overall good.
In my professional fields of education and research 'criticism' is an all-encompassing part of life - whether it is external peer review of submitted papers, grant applications or revised curricula, or internal mechanisms of review, and therefore 'criticism', to assess, maintain and improve quality. And most importance is attached to the views of the external examiner, assessor, or assurance agency.....so, in relation to this forum, and Cyprus in general, views from those with experience of life outside Cyprus can only be of overall benefit to the nation (even if those views are rejected they should be considered). And my observations within my professional life are that where the UK goes, Europe often follows, possibly because our culture of criticism is such that we are often 'ahead of the game' in understanding how to improve quality of practice. So, some views of Brits, even if they are critical of aspects of life in Cyprus, may also assist in finding ways to improve life in the island......
I was at an interesting talk this week, by someone who had been involved in improving air safety for British Airways. Prior to the mid-70s this airline had a pretty bad record for crashes and deaths, but since introduction of changes to the culture of professional practices within the workforce at that time there has not been a single death of a passenger as a result of an accident or incident. Prior to the mid-70s the chief pilot was 'God', all-powerful and unquestionable. The hierarchy below him (because it was always a 'him') was rigid and everyone 'knew their place'. The culture changed so that teamwork and collective responsibility was of the essence (I'm sure our aviators will be able to confirm and expand), so that the pilot could be questioned and was not above criticism. When an incident occurs now the culture is of complete openness to understand entirely why something happened, and definitely not to cover-up. Indeed, covering-up is what will bring censure to an individual rather than the actions which may have contributed to the incident. Moreover, there is sharing of information between airline companies - to ensure the highest standards of safety for all. So, in this case the culture of review and criticism has been entirely positive.
Of course, the UK and Cyprus have had a complex, intertwined history, and UK residents of Cyprus should be aware of that. I know there may be resentment of Brits because of our colonialist past, the mess resulting from independence and the Turkish invasion. I myself have been told by a resident of a village (otherwise perfectly friendly) that I would not be welcome to purchase a house there because British armed forces had hanged a village resident involved in EOKA activities there back in the 1950s. I didn't take it personally, just respected the views of this particular individual, clearly negatively influenced by direct experience of our shared history.
My overall point therefore is that criticism and review, both internal and external, can be positive. I don't see why Brits would have an agenda to 'badmouth' Cyprus, particularly those who have moved there, presumably because they consider a life there to be better than in the UK. Any criticism of Cyprus must be because they have a desire to see an improvement in various aspects of the island - what is wrong with that? Use that criticism in the appropriate way and Cypriots may find ways to improve life on the island further - it is the ultimate folly to consider Cypriot life as 'perfect' and beyond criticism. This does not mean replicating cultures and practices in the UK in their entirety, but, where appropriate, adopting and adapting those from the UK and elsewhere that suit the Cypriot mentality and culture.
Essay over......