Cyprus-Forum.com

[Get Real!]

Did he mention the one he got deleted?

No, what was that called?

[Oracle]

Did he mention the one he got deleted?

No, what was that called?

Erm ... Something about not taking Pot Shots at the RoC and it involved scrutinising "STUD" about his accusation that the RoC "courts were not fit for purpose" ... I found some data which contradicted him and then it all went poof!

[supporttheunderdog]

So, "STUD, do you work for the Cyprus Mail or is the Forum going to become the mouthpiece, not only of BAYRAK but also CM?

Admin, over to you ....

Other than I sometimes post there I have no connection whatsover with CM, nor with any other organisation or person who may post here.

Is that you are so blind to some of the things that are wrong?

Well if you cannot take it, tough!

[Get Real!]

So, "STUD, do you work for the Cyprus Mail or is the Forum going to become the mouthpiece, not only of BAYRAK but also CM?

Admin, over to you ....

Other than I sometimes post there I have no connection whatsover with CM, nor with any other organisation or person who may post here.

Is that you are so blind to some of the things that are wrong?

Well if you cannot take it, tough!

Dude, your English grammar and syntax suck so bad that you’re a disgrace to that Union Jack you’re carrying!

[Oracle]

So, "STUD, do you work for the Cyprus Mail or is the Forum going to become the mouthpiece, not only of BAYRAK but also CM?

Admin, over to you ....

Other than I sometimes post there I have no connection whatsover with CM, nor with any other organisation or person who may post here.

Is that you are so blind to some of the things that are wrong?

Well if you cannot take it, tough!

Oh yes, we can take "it" if "it's" true and evidenced. Not when it's thrown out as racial discrimination, which is all you are capable of.

Happy you are relieved from substantiating your accusations that Cypriot Courts are "unfit for purpose" ... slime-bag?

[supporttheunderdog]

Did he mention the one he got deleted?

No, what was that called?

Erm ... Something about not taking Pot Shots at the RoC and it involved scrutinising "STUD" about his accusation that the RoC "courts were not fit for purpose" ... I found some data which contradicted him and then it all went poof!

I never saw my reply hit the screen, it seemed to go poof as soon as if not before I hit the submit button, so I don't know what it was that I said, and never saw any data that contradicted what I said, not that I recall seeing much data from you anyway, that could have lead to that post's deletion.

[Get Real!]

Did he mention the one he got deleted?

No, what was that called?

Erm ... Something about not taking Pot Shots at the RoC and it involved scrutinising "STUD" about his accusation that the RoC "courts were not fit for purpose" ... I found some data which contradicted him and then it all went poof!

I never saw my reply hit the screen, it seemed to go poof as soon as if not before I hit the submit button, so I don't know what it was that I said, and never saw any data that contradicted what I said, not that I recall seeing much data from you anyway, that could have lead to that post's deletion.

So you initiated an anti-Cypriot thread with no evidence again eh?

Maybe it’s time you returned to C44 where you fit in…

[Oracle]

Did he mention the one he got deleted?

No, what was that called?

Erm ... Something about not taking Pot Shots at the RoC and it involved scrutinising "STUD" about his accusation that the RoC "courts were not fit for purpose" ... I found some data which contradicted him and then it all went poof!

I never saw my reply hit the screen, it seemed to go poof as soon as if not before I hit the submit button, so I don't know what it was that I said, and never saw any data that contradicted what I said, not that I recall seeing much data from you anyway, that could have lead to that post's deletion.

You're incapable of recognising data, so not a good judge. But the thread disappeared soon after you moaned about its appearance on the, now, locked thread. I guess Lana was trying to please you, being a Brit with a "Developer Gripe".

[Oracle]

Did he mention the one he got deleted?

No, what was that called?

Erm ... Something about not taking Pot Shots at the RoC and it involved scrutinising "STUD" about his accusation that the RoC "courts were not fit for purpose" ... I found some data which contradicted him and then it all went poof!

I never saw my reply hit the screen, it seemed to go poof as soon as if not before I hit the submit button, so I don't know what it was that I said, and never saw any data that contradicted what I said, not that I recall seeing much data from you anyway, that could have lead to that post's deletion.

So you initiated an anti-Cypriot thread with no evidence again eh?

Maybe it’s time you returned to C44 where you fit in…

GR! ... he wrote this, and I started a thread to get him to substantiate some of those slurs ... it didn't get far ...

Dear Janet

The usual smears and innuendos and generalisations from GR to support his own crack-pot theories, or is he suggesting that any such people who may have been conned and then going in to property business are themselves crooked? If so who and and on what basis?

GR- give us some facts, or wind your neck in, bonny lad!

Do NOT be put off by those who want this thread shut down. There is a small group of self appointed people with agendas of their own, some of whom are racist, and who think they own the Forum, and who do not like to get real to the fact that there are few rotten apples who are sadly souring the whole barrel that is Cyprus, which is a shame as it has lot going for it, including most of the people. Like everywhere there are bad people, sadly including devious estate agents, crooked developers, and most disgraceful of all, the crooked lawyers who betray the people they are both ethically and legally bound to protect, when they accept them as a customer, but while also secretly working for the developer/vendor, in clear breach of law society rules.

They, above all, deserve looking up!

However rather than tackle the underlying problems of crooked estate agents, developers and lawyers, and a government lacking the will to deal with the problems, with a judicial system that is arguably unfit for purpose, all of which, even probably unintentionally, is more to the benefit of the crooks, not the victims, and which sadly tarnishes the reputation of the whole of the Island, they try to censor debate.

At worst they try to denigrate the victims and indeed this post by GR is a classic of the genre. You know when it gets to this stage you have got someone worried.

However do be careful how you tread as at least one property developer has resorted to violence, and if that were happen your earlier conduct may be used against you to get charges reduced in seriousness and/or small sentences handed out.

Any way best of luck: there are lot of people rooting for you and other victims of property scams and threads like this will keep coming until the Powers that be take action and deal with the crooks.

Just don't let the bastards grind you down.

[supporttheunderdog]

Did he mention the one he got deleted?

No, what was that called?

Erm ... Something about not taking Pot Shots at the RoC and it involved scrutinising "STUD" about his accusation that the RoC "courts were not fit for purpose" ... I found some data which contradicted him and then it all went poof!

I never saw my reply hit the screen, it seemed to go poof as soon as if not before I hit the submit button, so I don't know what it was that I said, and never saw any data that contradicted what I said, not that I recall seeing much data from you anyway, that could have lead to that post's deletion.

So you initiated an anti-Cypriot thread with no evidence again eh?

Maybe it’s time you returned to C44 where you fit in…

No I didnt initiate that thread - Orifice did. And it was not anti Cypriot, that is just your interpretation of it.