Talisker wrote:...what are the characteristics which relate to this description?
Talisker wrote:Given the heterogeneous (and divided) nature of the populace how about someone (anyone) who wishes and works for the best interests of Cyprus as a singular nation?
Paphitis wrote:Talisker wrote:Given the heterogeneous (and divided) nature of the populace how about someone (anyone) who wishes and works for the best interests of Cyprus as a singular nation?
Naturally, a Cypriot (no matter what there ethnic background) is loyal to the RoC and will always place Cypriot interests before all else and work to achieve a liberated and united Cyprus from Paphos to Apostolos Andreas and from Limassol to Kyrenia. Everyone else are not Cypriots at all but are a mere nuisance and an enemy of the State.
Talisker wrote:Paphitis wrote:Talisker wrote:Given the heterogeneous (and divided) nature of the populace how about someone (anyone) who wishes and works for the best interests of Cyprus as a singular nation?
Naturally, a Cypriot (no matter what there ethnic background) is loyal to the RoC and will always place Cypriot interests before all else and work to achieve a liberated and united Cyprus from Paphos to Apostolos Andreas and from Limassol to Kyrenia. Everyone else are not Cypriots at all but are a mere nuisance and an enemy of the State.
I think it is dangerous to politicise the definition and argue that if someone is not a 'true Cypriot' then they are 'an enemy of the state'. For example, the governing party can argue that all their policies are in the national interest and have the democratic support of 'the people', and therefore any disagreement with these same policies could be deemed 'anti-Cypriot' - the route to suppression of freedom of speech and thought.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests