by supporttheunderdog » Sat Nov 13, 2010 10:04 am
cut and pasted from elswhere
Robert Klien has only ever made four, in reality only 2. posts on this site, as two in identical terms Significantly only in connection inconnection with the conor karryanus dispute.
The first two refered to an affitdavit that Karyannis signed in 2007, witbnessed by the SBA authorities. Now witnessing by the SBAuthorities does NOT make the statement in any way true: all they have confirmed is that the oerson making bthe signature is who he says it.
As far as can see itt is mostly self serving opionion. I understand from what I have seenm the para 24 of the affitdavit is highly contentious. I undertand Conor has evidence which clearly shows he made a number of efforts to mett the payment requests but karyannis took steps to prevent paynment, including an attempt using a court appointed official, apparently to engineer an alleged breach by Conor.
Another unusal point of contention is whether or not the property in dispute could be sold to a third party, since my understanding is that there is a lady who lives in that house beliving it to be hers, having (So I understand) been sold the prioperty by Karyannis.
There are I understand some very interesting issues to abbout the allged withrdrawl of vthe contract from the land registry using what was claimed to be a forged POA and the role of lawyers in whole thing, with some seeming to represent and than not represent various people.
The second two virtually identical posts refer to the new website, which as outlined elsewhere, has only popped up in the past few days following the court decision.
So however I can read the site properly perhaps RobertKlein can explain how he got the scanned images translated by a google translator, since as far as I know to use these translators one needs to cut and past text in the form of Ascii charcters or similar, rather than the blackand white blobs that form the images on a scaned document?
I do neverthles suspect that if RobertKlein exists (and I have some doubts that he is anything more than a figment of the Karyannis immagination) he is a stooge acting for Karyannis, since it seems very unusual to me that he only has popped up twice in connection with this particular matter.
Come on "Robert" youve been rumbled!