Gasman wrote:http://www.cyprus-mail.com/opinions/case-stolen-documents/20101109... A year later, a book has been published based on these emails. It includes a rather creative interpretation of what the emails say but that isn’t really the point. To publish the emails in a book is clearly in contravention of the European Convention on human rights and European Union law.
So some members of the Cypriot parliament have decided to take this issue up itself. Well, some members have and some have been opposed to this so there is a bit of division about that. Those who wish to pursue it, you might think, wish to investigate why these breaches of law and European standards of human rights have taken place within their own country. After all, you would imagine that members of Parliament in Cyprus would be very embarrassed that such a thing had happened to the United Nations of all organisations.
Not a bit of it. The investigation which some members of Parliament want is into whether through these private emails the United Nations has been behaving appropriately. You would think it would be impossible to behave inappropriately through private emails. Unless, of course, you were breaking the law! ...
Off to find out what this book's called ...
"Σημαδεμένης Τράπουλας"
http://hellenicrevenge.blogspot.com/201 ... _8598.html
http://christofias-watch.blogspot.com/
These 2 blogs seems have the potential to be the first to publish them online...
By George Georgiou
Achilles Emilianidou, Michael Short and George Straight gathered various documents dynomilion leaked correspondence found Downer and his team researched and found other documents and presented us with a picture of the past two years as regards the Cyprus issue.
This major effort was a book titled "marked cards", a title fully compatible with reality.
The problem is that through the book three, the question arises (or rather the label) that Mr Christofias was aware that he played cards with marked cards, not only did something to replace the deck with a 'clean', but the behavior allowed opponents to mark more and more cards.
What other than the above may mean that the Cypriot side did not react when the UN official with responsibility for Europe and Latin America, exemani the intervention of Turkey in order to lose the reference to Orams case to Security Council Resolution?
Quite simply, a member of the UN Secretariat could not resist the audacious intervention of Turkey in UN documents, outraged, frightened by Downer that R / C side would react, but we loufaxame.
What other than the fact that Christofias knew he played with marked cards is the case with Nami and James? Complains that Nami did not have the Cypriot side to use the term 'Länder', if agreed, the term "constituent states "and the James reassured that this was not to react to the Greek Cypriot public opinion.
Such incidents show that our negotiator and his team did not have hard battles to serve the interests of the Cypriot side, but primarily cared for the supposedly "good climate" and to achieve convergence (which is achieved only if resolved ), there are many in the marked cards.
The book's Achilles Emilianides, Michael Kontos and George Straight proves what many knew for some time: Christofias claimed not ours.
And now he can tell us if vindicated, as the pompous way he told the emigrants?
Probably will loufaxei.
... And revelations!
