Cyprus-Forum.com

[boulio]

i dont understand what is a double standard?

[Viewpoint]

i dont understand what is a double standard?

You want to impose different condition for Famagusta than the ports in the south.

[Me Ed]

i dont understand what is a double standard?

You want to impose different condition for Famagusta than the ports in the south.

So what's the difference between that and what's happening at the moment?

[Viewpoint]

i dont understand what is a double standard?

You want to impose different condition for Famagusta than the ports in the south.

So what's the difference between that and what's happening at the moment?

The ports in the south are under Gc control with no interference/supervision from the EU/UN but they want us to be supervised, why? Clearly double standards.

[Me Ed]

i dont understand what is a double standard?

You want to impose different condition for Famagusta than the ports in the south.

So what's the difference between that and what's happening at the moment?

The ports in the south are under Gc control with no interference/supervision from the EU/UN but they want us to be supervised, why? Clearly double standards.

Only that port will be supervised and BOTH sides use of that port will be under EU/UN supervision. All your other illegally held ports will not be supervised.

You obviously lack the vision that your fellow TCs have.

[Viewpoint]

i dont understand what is a double standard?

You want to impose different condition for Famagusta than the ports in the south.

So what's the difference between that and what's happening at the moment?

The ports in the south are under Gc control with no interference/supervision from the EU/UN but they want us to be supervised, why? Clearly double standards.

Only that port will be supervised and BOTH sides use of that port will be under EU/UN supervision. All your other illegally held ports will not be supervised.

You obviously lack the vision that your fellow TCs do.

Where is the offer for non supervision of all other ports including Ercan? Why do we need supervision of a port we already operate?

[Hermes]

Unfortunately, what our T/C friends seem unaware of is that Turkey isn't interested in opening the port of Famagusta in exchange for trade and putting its EU accession path back on track. What Turkey wants is recognition for the north. This proposal doesn't give them recognition hence the rejection of the plan. I wish them luck but since when have the opinions and interests of T/Cs mattered to Turkey?

[Viewpoint]

Unfortunately, what our T/C friends seem unaware of is that Turkey isn't interested in opening the port of Famagusta in exchange for trade and putting its EU accession path back on track. What Turkey wants is recognition for the north. This proposal doesn't give them recognition hence the rejection of the plan. I wish them luck but since when have the opinions and interests of T/Cs mattered to Turkey?

Have you ever heard of such a thing as common goals? I know you never had any with us TCs so you probably dont.

[Me Ed]

i dont understand what is a double standard?

You want to impose different condition for Famagusta than the ports in the south.

So what's the difference between that and what's happening at the moment?

The ports in the south are under Gc control with no interference/supervision from the EU/UN but they want us to be supervised, why? Clearly double standards.

Only that port will be supervised and BOTH sides use of that port will be under EU/UN supervision. All your other illegally held ports will not be supervised.

You obviously lack the vision that your fellow TCs do.

Where is the offer for non supervision of all other ports including Ercan? Why do we need supervision of a port we already operate?

One step at a time VP.

[boulio]

Have you ever heard of such a thing as common goals? I know you never had any with us TCs so you probably dont.

here are a few common goals:

1)t/c get to trade
2)turkeys ascesion begin again
3)g/c return to varoshia

the funning thing is by excepting these proposals the t/c and turkey really dosent cost them a thing(money,time,energy)and get what the supposadly want(trade,eu chapters)it is the g/c who will have to bear the burden of revitalizing a ghost town.

is that what you want VP?TRADE CORRECT?