The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


ANADOLU JET HAS BEGUN FLIGHTS TO LONDON STANSTED AIRPORT

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Kikapu » Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:34 pm

Viewpoint wrote:Why is Ercan on the flight boards of Stanstead Gatwick İstanbul???


Whats on the flight departure board only indicates where the flight eventually is ending up. I doubt anyone will make too much fuss about that. It is ONLY information. This is typical with "direct flights", meaning no plane change along the way. However, the flight plan filed by the pilots to meet the regulations and to satisfy the insurance company, is ONLY from Stanstead to Istanbul. What the pilot does after reaching Istanbul's air space is no concern of the British Civil Aviation authorities or the insurance company. My understanding is, that if the plane were to go down, God forbid, somewhere between Istanbul airspace and Ercan without first landing in Istanbul for no good reason, such as bad whether all over Turkey, which then the plane is forced to fly all the way to Cyprus to make a landing, I doubt the plane or it's passengers are insured, since the original flight plan was to go to Istanbul. That's the kind of "fly by night" operation I would not dare to put myself into. It's not for the passengers themselves so much, who may very well end up getting killed, but what about their surviving family members to get compensation from the airlines and the airlines insurance company.! My belief is, they will be denied any compensation, unless the plane first lands in Istanbul and then another flight plan is filed and that separate flight having it's own separate insurance coverage different from the one on the London-Istanbul leg.
Last edited by Kikapu on Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Kikapu
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 18050
Joined: Sun Apr 16, 2006 6:18 pm

Postby Mr. T » Thu Nov 11, 2010 9:58 pm

Raymanoff wrote:here "ANADOLU JET HAS BEGUN FLIGHTS TO LONDON STANSTED AIRPORT"

shall i explain to your less complicated brain that a flight to Larnaca to Moscow happens... LCA > SVO is as stated... take off and land... now, given your complicated position ( i call it doggystyle) you can fly it Ercan > Istanbl > Nudapest > Prague > Paris > London... all the 3rd parties know that the flight comes from Istambul...not "Ercan" which doesnt exist actually... but anyway.


Oh no! Another person who has to rely on unsubstantiated insults rather than sensible argument and who is also living it a fairytale world where truths are denied. This is a sad state of affairs. Just as a matter of interest when and where did you gain your degree? Incidentally if you use the adjectives like 'less and complicated' in the way you have you need to make comparison with another brain or other brains.

There IS NO REFERENCE to direct flights.
If one says, for instance, XYZ airline has begun flights from Belem to Karachi and the plane lands en route in Accra and again in Bahrain this would be advertised as a flight from Belem to Karachi exactly the same as a flight being advertised as Stanstead to Ercan whether or not the flight stops off at Istanbul on the way. Comprehend?
It really is very, very simple
Sorry to spoil your dreams but Ercan does exist. It was originally constructed by the British in World War 11 and used again after 1974. Like many hundreds of thousands if not millions of others I have used the airport there. Try looking on Google Earth. You may learn something.
User avatar
Mr. T
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 272
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2008 1:45 pm
Location: The Marches

Postby B25 » Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:04 pm

Mr. T wrote:
Raymanoff wrote:here "ANADOLU JET HAS BEGUN FLIGHTS TO LONDON STANSTED AIRPORT"

shall i explain to your less complicated brain that a flight to Larnaca to Moscow happens... LCA > SVO is as stated... take off and land... now, given your complicated position ( i call it doggystyle) you can fly it Ercan > Istanbl > Nudapest > Prague > Paris > London... all the 3rd parties know that the flight comes from Istambul...not "Ercan" which doesnt exist actually... but anyway.


Oh no! Another person who has to rely on unsubstantiated insults rather than sensible argument and who is also living it a fairytale world where truths are denied. This is a sad state of affairs. Just as a matter of interest when and where did you gain your degree? Incidentally if you use the adjectives like 'less and complicated' in the way you have you need to make comparison with another brain or other brains.

There IS NO REFERENCE to direct flights.
If one says, for instance, XYZ airline has begun flights from Belem to Karachi and the plane lands en route in Accra and again in Bahrain this would be advertised as a flight from Belem to Karachi exactly the same as a flight being advertised as Stanstead to Ercan whether or not the flight stops off at Istanbul on the way. Comprehend?
It really is very, very simple
Sorry to spoil your dreams but Ercan does exist. It was originally constructed by the British in World War 11 and used again after 1974. Like many hundreds of thousands if not millions of others I have used the airport there. Try looking on Google Earth. You may learn something.


OK then to the clever clots TCs, did or did not the British Government high court just recently reject an appeal for DIRECT FLIGHTS TO ERCAN??? Answers on the back of a postage stamp please.

Just because you are doing things illegally, AGAIN, does not make them cosha, geddit, problem solved.

So to summarise; NO DIRECT FLIGHTS, NO DIRECT TRADE, NO F RECOGNITION.
User avatar
B25
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6543
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 7:03 pm
Location: ** Classified **

Postby runaway » Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:12 pm

User avatar
runaway
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1723
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 12:41 pm
Location: Istanbul

Postby Raymanoff » Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:31 pm

737, worst airplane.... :D
User avatar
Raymanoff
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2119
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: Vraxonisida

Postby Jerry » Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:35 pm

Raymanoff wrote:737, worst airplane.... :D


Are you sure, it looked more like an Airbus to me?
Jerry
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: UK

Postby Jerry » Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:38 pm

Just checked their site, 22 737s and ony 1 Airbus. Looks like I'm wrong
Jerry
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: UK

Postby Raymanoff » Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:39 pm

it looked to you re... does a tomato looks like a cucumber to you too? how freaking difficult is to spot aircraft models?
User avatar
Raymanoff
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2119
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: Vraxonisida

Postby Jerry » Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:42 pm

Raymanoff wrote:it looked to you re... does a tomato looks like a cucumber to you too? how freaking difficult is to spot aircraft models?


The 737s I've flown on did not have the sticky up bits on the end of the wings. Some versions do some don't
Jerry
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: UK

Postby Raymanoff » Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:53 pm

omg you call Wingtip the "sticky up" bits... do you even know what those are for?
Last edited by Raymanoff on Thu Nov 11, 2010 10:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Raymanoff
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2119
Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 12:36 pm
Location: Vraxonisida

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests