Cyprus-Forum.com

[Milo]

And so we see that 'Part 1' of Conor's campaign has come to a predictable end, predictable to those who (like myself) were neither swayed nor influenced by the warped judgements of Conor's psuedo 'Entourage'.

A singularly bad day for Milo and her ilk, who would have much preferred (and relished the prospect of) many years of incarceration for those who were 'Goaded' into taking the action they took. (a small gift to help you get over the disappointment).

Now, let us consider the outcome of the next stage 'Part 2', which is of far greater significance to the reputation of Cyprus than a spanking received by a 'Naughty Boy' from those he antagonized.

The principles of 'Equivalence' must prevail in this case and the Judiciary will no doubt recognize that a rigorous requital must be levied upon the 'Evildoer' lest the instigator profits from the action which requires judicial intervention.

In the case of Cornelius Desmond O'Dwyer, I am of the opinion that HIS actions throughout the transaction under such scrutiny, WERE the reason for ALL the unpleasantaries that developed thereafter.

The fact that Conor (as he is now generally known) is able to produce such an array of 'Self Concocted' evidence, is more of a weakness than a strength since he has encapsulated the bulk of his involvement in the case on both audio and video tapes, freely available to the wide world.

Not such a bad idea initially BUT, when he resorted to filthy language and abuse and directed such to innocent parties, he unwittingly left the door open to certain comparisons of character 'To wit' the vulgar blackguard insults the gentleman, and no more so evident than in the exchange on 'Blog 6 (part 3) on You Tube' when Fotos G Pittadjis received the ultimate insult, far too disgusting to reproduce on this forum (out of deference to the sensibilities of the Ladies).

My OWN opinion (and I could be wrong of course) is that Conor has created his own 'Nemesis' and may well rue the day when he did not accept (contrary to advice given at that time) a sum of money in excess of that which he originally paid.

He also ignored the advice that he should withdraw from his campaign of personal abuse and apologize for his gross misconduct.

Greed may yet be his downfall. (IMHO) as one who is in no way connected to the 'Property industry (for the benefit of Milo)

God you write a load of absolute pish

Maybe you know the convicted thugs, maybe you are worried that they may get you for not defending their actions, maybe they have passed you the usual brown envelopes to up their corner? Either way someone is a convicted criminal tonight with a suspended sentence hanging over them, someone else is,nt

I think you are connected to the property industry, you seem anxious about something in your replies

Very nice talking with you though

[Milo]

Forums need a balance this one was heavily onesided good posters leave, newbies ask a question that are ridiculed,

Here’s a classic example why “good posters” get ignored and eventually leave!

One of the reasons is because they don’t make bloody sense! To make sense your sentence should’ve been written as follows…

“Forums need a balance; this one was heavily one sided and good posters left while newbies would ask a question and get ridiculed”

If readers are struggling to understand what you’re trying to convey they’ll just skip to the next message, and if you do that to them 3-4 times they’ll just PERMANENTLY erase you from the list of posters they follow!

So… lesson #1: Get your spelling/grammar/syntax right!

Amen?

Oh hells bells GR is that the best you could throw at me, you pedant. Its not a contest on grammar and spelling is it? Its about getting one up on fellow posters I always thought. Some of you need a clear Forum to do so the rest of us just pop up now and again when we are not busy.

I think you are beginning to like me go and lie down and come back later with more hurtful remarks. It should,nt take you to long

[Get Real!]

Forums need a balance this one was heavily onesided good posters leave, newbies ask a question that are ridiculed,

Here’s a classic example why “good posters” get ignored and eventually leave!

One of the reasons is because they don’t make bloody sense! To make sense your sentence should’ve been written as follows…

“Forums need a balance; this one was heavily one sided and good posters left while newbies would ask a question and get ridiculed”

If readers are struggling to understand what you’re trying to convey they’ll just skip to the next message, and if you do that to them 3-4 times they’ll just PERMANENTLY erase you from the list of posters they follow!

So… lesson #1: Get your spelling/grammar/syntax right!

Amen?

Oh hells bells GR is that the best you could throw at me, you pedant. Its not a contest on grammar and spelling is it? Its about getting one up on fellow posters I always thought. Some of you need a clear Forum to do so the rest of us just pop up now and again when we are not busy.

I think you are beginning to like me go and lie down and come back later with more hurtful remarks. It should,nt take you to long

Here was your opportunity to ask for lesson #2 but you blew it!

Now you’ll forever remain an unpopular “good poster driven out” by those more popular than you!

[Get Real!]

Bring back hanging!

I forgot to invite the esteemed CF Executioner who’s been out of a job for some decades…

Sounds like he should be the first to test the equipment!

His eerie absence may indicate that he did!

[Milo]

Forums need a balance this one was heavily onesided good posters leave, newbies ask a question that are ridiculed,

Here’s a classic example why “good posters” get ignored and eventually leave!

One of the reasons is because they don’t make bloody sense! To make sense your sentence should’ve been written as follows…

“Forums need a balance; this one was heavily one sided and good posters left while newbies would ask a question and get ridiculed”

If readers are struggling to understand what you’re trying to convey they’ll just skip to the next message, and if you do that to them 3-4 times they’ll just PERMANENTLY erase you from the list of posters they follow!

So… lesson #1: Get your spelling/grammar/syntax right!

Amen?

Oh hells bells GR is that the best you could throw at me, you pedant. Its not a contest on grammar and spelling is it? Its about getting one up on fellow posters I always thought. Some of you need a clear Forum to do so the rest of us just pop up now and again when we are not busy.

I think you are beginning to like me go and lie down and come back later with more hurtful remarks. It should,nt take you to long

Here was your opportunity to ask for lesson #2 but you blew it!

Now you’ll forever remain an unpopular “good poster driven out” by those more popular than you!

No that did,nt hurt, come on man throw one

[B25]

Yes it is, because thats what all the Brits would be comparing it to plus you are trying to make out that things happen in Cyprus that don't elsewhere, hence to comparison to the 'civilised' UK.

There is no common or uncommon, the judge takes all the info in and comes out with what he/she thinks suitable as they do in any other country in the world, since you seem to think it is unique here.

I am/was asking simple unloaded question(s) and not at all trying to make something out of anything, or making any assumptions on what is unique to Cyprus or not unique to Cyprus. I am not trained in the way of any justice system (UK, Cyprus or other) so am not trying to catch anyone out or put them on the spot. As has been said elsewhere 'we' only see the website of Conor and comments on message boards, from that we form our opinions. In the court case perhaps more evidence was presented by either side ...

Anyway, just trying to establish if the sentence is all 'we' (as in the public looking in) are going to get or will the court/judge publish the reasoning and/or other documents (evidence, testimonials etc) relating to the case ... all of which will help 'us' to understand what happened, for better or for worse.

OK, fair do's. Apologies.

[Schnauzer]

And so we see that 'Part 1' of Conor's campaign has come to a predictable end, predictable to those who (like myself) were neither swayed nor influenced by the warped judgements of Conor's psuedo 'Entourage'.

A singularly bad day for Milo and her ilk, who would have much preferred (and relished the prospect of) many years of incarceration for those who were 'Goaded' into taking the action they took. (a small gift to help you get over the disappointment).

Now, let us consider the outcome of the next stage 'Part 2', which is of far greater significance to the reputation of Cyprus than a spanking received by a 'Naughty Boy' from those he antagonized.

The principles of 'Equivalence' must prevail in this case and the Judiciary will no doubt recognize that a rigorous requital must be levied upon the 'Evildoer' lest the instigator profits from the action which requires judicial intervention.

In the case of Cornelius Desmond O'Dwyer, I am of the opinion that HIS actions throughout the transaction under such scrutiny, WERE the reason for ALL the unpleasantaries that developed thereafter.

The fact that Conor (as he is now generally known) is able to produce such an array of 'Self Concocted' evidence, is more of a weakness than a strength since he has encapsulated the bulk of his involvement in the case on both audio and video tapes, freely available to the wide world.

Not such a bad idea initially BUT, when he resorted to filthy language and abuse and directed such to innocent parties, he unwittingly left the door open to certain comparisons of character 'To wit' the vulgar blackguard insults the gentleman, and no more so evident than in the exchange on 'Blog 6 (part 3) on You Tube' when Fotos G Pittadjis received the ultimate insult, far too disgusting to reproduce on this forum (out of deference to the sensibilities of the Ladies).

My OWN opinion (and I could be wrong of course) is that Conor has created his own 'Nemesis' and may well rue the day when he did not accept (contrary to advice given at that time) a sum of money in excess of that which he originally paid.

He also ignored the advice that he should withdraw from his campaign of personal abuse and apologize for his gross misconduct.

Greed may yet be his downfall. (IMHO) as one who is in no way connected to the 'Property industry (for the benefit of Milo)

God you write a load of absolute pish

Maybe you know the convicted thugs, maybe you are worried that they may get you for not defending their actions, maybe they have passed you the usual brown envelopes to up their corner? Either way someone is a convicted criminal tonight with a suspended sentence hanging over them, someone else is,nt

I think you are connected to the property industry, you seem anxious about something in your replies

Very nice talking with you though

That those who inflicted physical pain on Conor would receive punishment for their actions was a foregone conclusion, however, the severity of their punishment fell far short of the expectations of those who rallied to his cause and, in one sense, they must count the verdict as a LOSS. (IMHO)

I have no knowledge of ANY of the defendants BUT, I do have an insight to their values, particularly when it comes to those connected with Family, Friends and associates and I must confess that I share such values myself.

I am not a man that walks the streets in fear , neither am I susceptible to bribery and corruption.

If you consider that those who reacted to the ignorance of HE whose schemes did not pan out quite as profitable as he expected, deserved punishment, then by all means 'Gloat' over that which YOU consider to be a victory and kindly accept my sympathy for your small mindedness.

As I have already indicated, I am in no way connected to the property business, nor am I aquainted with any person (other than Jimmy Light) who has had any contact with any of the parties involved on either side.

In closing, I would like to point out that there are certain options (still open to those who received their sentences) which might result in such being quashed...... were I the Judge, I would have advised them of a certain direction that might well achieve such an objective, I am sure that in the process of time, slates will be cleaned and you and your followers will have more to mourn about.

As to your comment that it was nice talking with me, I am unaware of any meeting I have had with you, unless you are that flirty young thing I met in Ayia Napa last weekend (falling about drunk with her breasts exposed) who received a well deserved dressing down from yours truly.

Incidentally, I have the strangest feeling that there will be a (Part 3) before this awful business is concluded.

[Milo]

Conor's provocation amounted to the fact that he had turned up to take photographs of his home.

This case today was prosecuted not by Conor O'Dwyer, this case was prosecuted by the Republic of Cyprus and the prosecutors office, they thought their was a case to answer and there still is, I believe this case will now go to the Supreme Court, it is not over yet, not by a long way.

Christoforos and Marios Karayiannas are tonight convicted criminals, they always will be, they can never change that, furthermore they have a ten month suspended jail sentence hanging over their heads, would you want to buy a home from a convicted criminal, would you want to experience their unique method of "after sales service" for yourself, I think not.

They are due to appear in court again on five further occasions in Larnaca, with reference to the illegal selling of a house, should this be proved, this can carry a prison sentence of up to seven years, only now they will be appearing as convicted criminals with a suspended prison sentence hanging over their heads.

[Jack M]

No doubt the judge has to take into account all the circumstances. Conor seems pretty big and brusque and maybe there was more evidence to show he went looking for trouble than we have been told by Conor, here on this forum.

I abhor physical violence, but I can see how men can be driven to it. A momentary mistake (especially if provoked) should be offered some leniency. It's not like Conor is some meek, gentle, quiet old lady whose only 5ft tall

Conor seems pretty big compared to what in your one eyed view? He's about 5'6". Certainly if you consider that big, you would have thought the 3rd convicted coward thug a veritable giant.

The evidence showed that he held him down while the other two cowards went to work on him with feet and fists. When asked in court why he had lied in his initial statement to the police his response was 'because they told me to'.

That 'momentary' mistake was premeditated as was evidenced by the police in court.

Provokation involved taking photos of his own house. Yes, that is a really terrible thing to do. Even now he is still the lawful owner of the house, as confirmed by your own Minister of the Interior.

I'll leave it at that because it is quite clear that you don't accept the truth even when it is right in front of you. You weren't in court to hear the evidence but find it quite convenient to make up your own version of 'facts'.

[B25]

Conor's provocation amounted to the fact that he had turned up to take photographs of his home.

This case today was prosecuted not by Conor O'Dwyer, this case was prosecuted by the Republic of Cyprus and the prosecutors office, they thought their was a case to answer and there still is, I believe this case will now go to the Supreme Court, it is not over yet, not by a long way.

Christoforos and Marios Karayiannas are tonight convicted criminals, they always will be, they can never change that, furthermore they have a ten month suspended jail sentence hanging over their heads, would you want to buy a home from a convicted criminal, would you want to experience their unique method of "after sales service" for yourself, I think not.

They are due to appear in court again on five further occasions in Larnaca, with reference to the illegal selling of a house, should this be proved, this can carry a prison sentence of up to seven years, only now they will be appearing as convicted criminals with a suspended prison sentence hanging over their heads.

Duuno what you are on about, about 20%+ of the UK population are convcited criminals, they get by. This will be history in a short time unless they get 'done' further down the line.

As for provocation, well, if publishing someone is an arsehole all over the www, as conor does on his website (as in Kara-ANUS), I would view that as provocation. Not to mention the verbal abuse he gave them.

You could say a non payment of a speeding ticket will give you a criminal record, or lifting a bar of chocolate from a kiosk would do the same. Go to any primary school in the UK and most mums are there showing off their tags around their ankles as if its something of a trophy.

You are trying to make this a bigger deal than it is. OK, so you didn't get the blood you wanted, but you got the guilty verdict which should help you and your merry men to the next stage of the game. Be happy.