Filitsa wrote:Schnauzer wrote:Filitsa wrote:You answered my question quite adequately, Schnauzer, as I had anticipated. However, it should be duly noted that Wallace believed, "If we can afford tremendous sums of money to win the war, we can afford to invest whatever amount it takes to win the peace." The press were all over this statement, for example:
"Mr. Wallace neglects the fact that such a thing as a 'free'
lunch never existed. Until man acquires the power of
creation, someone will always have to pay for a free lunch
(Lima News, 1942).
Consequently, the TANSTAFFL mnemonic is attributable not to Mr. Wallace but the press.
Thank you for your response Filitsa, I was quite unaware of Henry A Wallace's remark and do hope that my interpretation of events were not in any way misleading.
My intention when I created this thread, was to highlight the hypocrisy which (although concealed) very often accompanies 'Foreign Aid' as we have become accustomed to calling it, when in fact it has become something of a political tool used to gain an advantage in another territory.
The pity IS, that the ordinary folk who donate both goods and monies to various charities (in supreme good faith) are merely furnishing those charities (in many cases) with the means to pursue other objectives.
The fact that corruption and mishandling of the benefits intended for the victims of either natural or unnatural disasters is well known, does little to encourage regular subscription to such charities, the alternative (non support) is unfortunately unthinkable.
It's a cruel world.
"It's a cruel world."
That's rather harsh, Shnauzer. Cruelty may occurr in certain pockets of the world from time to time, but the world in itself is not cruel. For instance, America is still in first place for total foreign aid, and Americans are increasingly donating to private institutions, circumventing government institution, to be sure money/goods/services are getting to those in need in a more direct and cost-beneficial fashion. This is promising, don't you think?
Anyway, I most definitely understand the point of your post.
Filitsa, you are quite obviously a kindly person and I would not wish to interfere with your perspectives on this particular subject, however, if I may touch on one example of that which takes place in the guise of 'Foreign Aid' (when used as a political tool) and select a highly controversial case (thus giving those who might be interested an opportunity to 'Vent their Spleen')............ I will discuss the matter of Zimbabwe and the 'Foreign Aid' fiasco that took place there.
President Robert Mugabe (one time Sir Robert Mugabe Order of the Garter of Bath) stripped of his title on the eve of the one time Terrorist Nelson Mandela's (incarcerated for many years for his crimes) honorary birthday bash with Her Maj in attendance..................... see how we lay the groundwork?.
Refused to accept 'Foreign Aid' whilst his nation was under pressure due to draconianlike embargoes, clearly stating that he was not prepared to capitulate to the demands and interference of the British Government.
When an election drew near, Morgan Tsvangirai stood in opposition BUT, the fact that he was known to be ready to don the robes of a 'Puppet', coupled with the fact that an American (I believe) convoy was stopped and found to be carrying 'Anti Mugabe' literature and ordered to either withdraw or be blown up in their vehicles (and quite justifiably so in my opinion), the word went out that the election was corrupted and further hardships were visited upon the starving population of Zimbabwe.
It was even suggested (by one smart M.P.) , that there should be no crossing of borders and that all bank transactions be frozen, that the electricity supply should be cut off...........Some 'Aid' 'eh ?.
All this heaped upon a deprived Zimbabwean population because President Robert Mugabe would NOT capitulate and would rather see his people in such dire straits than return the power of his nation to the 'White Slavemasters' (which he had kicked out years before).
Naturally, the NAME of Robert Mugabe was (and still is) one to be despised by ALL freedom loving persons throughout the Western hemisphere, the NAME of Nelson Mandela is now revered throughout the same area and a statue of the one time terrorist now stands in Parliament Square. (I suspect it is there to frighten the pigeons, and the 'White Folks')
Robert Mugabe told Gordon Brown to 'Mind his own business', he also informed him that he was but 'A speck of sand on the earth', he also made it known when he was about to be stripped of his Knighthood, that he had had advance information about such an act and ......... he pre-empted the act by informing those with the authority, to "Stick your Knighthood up your Backside" (though I suspect he was a little more direct in his language, similar to miltiades )
Now, for a man of his advancing years, I think Robert Mugabe should be afforded some recognition for his courage, I know full well that I am in the minority when I say such a thing but, the fact that I am able to recognize the tenacity of the man and admire him for it, does NOT mean that I agree with his policies.
One small example of the virtues of 'Foreign Aid'. (IMHO)