georgios100 wrote:cyprusgrump wrote:georgios100 wrote:I just don't understand the positions taken by Cyprusgrump & Paphitis on this issue.
Harmful emissions from air defence systems, surveillance antennas, radars and even cellphones in a form of microwaves are a fact.
Everybody on this planet knows that. It's no secret. The jig is up.
As I said before, these baby deaths COULD be attributed to radar emissions.
Being a Brit wannabe is one thing... undisputed science facts is another. I pick the science side... sorry old chaps!!!
And given the evidence you have presented they COULD just as easily be attributed to tiny little men from outer space...
What evidence? Radiation is not good for you... you don't think so? Then install 10 radar dishes on your property and wait 5 years... if you are still alive, give me a call...
When I say "it could be", that means maybe, perhaps...
So far no one knows what caused these deaths. Is it illegal to search for reasons? If my explanation is outright rejected (don't know why...) what's yours? What? Didn't hear you well... you don't have an explanation?
Your hysterical 'reason' for the deaths of babies in the 1960s links them to the on-going use of the equipment and baseless speculation that others have been harmed too. None of which currently has any basis in fact.
As Paphitis pointed out, we are surrounded by radiation from many sources with little obvious effect.
I can't say that these devices did not cause the deaths of the babies. However, given that the babes continue to be occupied and their staff are not dropping like flies from the effects I would assume that there is some other cause for this short-term tragedy.
Stop being so hysterical.