The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Christofias and the Annan Plan

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Viewpoint » Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:48 pm

ZoC wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:Better get used to it.


u been saying that since 1573. and we never will.


not our problem.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby ZoC » Mon Oct 25, 2010 10:07 pm

Viewpoint wrote:
ZoC wrote:
Viewpoint wrote:Better get used to it.


u been saying that since 1573. and we never will.


not our problem.


so why tell us to 'better get used to it'?... why should we?
User avatar
ZoC
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3280
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:29 pm

Postby shahmaran » Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:50 pm

Hermes wrote:
shahmaran wrote:
Not doing it would not have changed the fact that the people running the South are indeed racist religious bastards.

That's what the real war is about.


Er... that is why the ROC is a thriving member of the European Union and Turkey is pals with Islamist nutters like Sudan, Hezbollah, Hamas and Iran.

How are all those imams that the AKP has been bringing into the north? Are you all good Muslims now?


AKP's will come and go but Turkey will stay secular.

What are you going to do? :lol:

The last time your system allowed a priest to rule the country, you got divided in 2.

Who knows what will come next :lol:
User avatar
shahmaran
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5461
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:58 pm
Location: In conflict

Postby BirKibrisli » Tue Oct 26, 2010 1:32 am

bill cobbett wrote:
boulio wrote:
EU member or not the result is the same no help from the international community speaks volumes to those who want to understand. Ask any TC you want to choose between becoming a minority under gc rule or the current situation and becoming Turkish the majority Would no hesitation in choosing the latter.


but thats why there was a offer for a federal model for cyprus for the last 35 years.but the turks want to be rulers in the north and partners in the south.Sorry thats not happening.


Yes, very well said... in a few words, sums up why a BBF plan will always be rejected by the more realistic amongst us...

"... rulers in the north and partners in the south.... "

Shame that there are a few foolish people around, mis-guided wishful thinkers, living in cloud cuckoo land with their heads in the clouds who can't accept these few very truthful words and who refuse to accept realities, the facts on the ground and in the history of the past fifty-five years, facts that are as plain as the noses on the ends of their faces... if only they would get their heads out of the sand and come to terms with the reality of what talks after talks after talks about any form of BBF are telling them.....

>>>> It's BBF = PARTITION boys and girls, or an arrangement that is one very small and very easy to take step away from it.


Well,dear Bill...

One could say that the GC official position is ...rulers in the south and rulers in the north...by hook or by crook!!!

It is crystal clear now that the GC deep state cannot be trusted..The mentality that renegated on the Constitutional agreement before the ink was dry in 1960 ,and went on to prepare a little plan called Akritas to rob the TCs of any power,is alive and well,and living in some female UN official's underpants stealing UN documents on negotiations... :lol:

The TCs need a foolproof and watertight solution to be safe from the deep GC state...The BBF is the best you can hope for...When you finally come to your senses and realise that the sun does not shine out of your arses!!! :wink:
User avatar
BirKibrisli
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6162
Joined: Tue Aug 16, 2005 4:28 pm
Location: Australia

Postby ZoC » Tue Oct 26, 2010 2:00 am

BirKibrisli wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:
boulio wrote:
EU member or not the result is the same no help from the international community speaks volumes to those who want to understand. Ask any TC you want to choose between becoming a minority under gc rule or the current situation and becoming Turkish the majority Would no hesitation in choosing the latter.


but thats why there was a offer for a federal model for cyprus for the last 35 years.but the turks want to be rulers in the north and partners in the south.Sorry thats not happening.


Yes, very well said... in a few words, sums up why a BBF plan will always be rejected by the more realistic amongst us...

"... rulers in the north and partners in the south.... "

Shame that there are a few foolish people around, mis-guided wishful thinkers, living in cloud cuckoo land with their heads in the clouds who can't accept these few very truthful words and who refuse to accept realities, the facts on the ground and in the history of the past fifty-five years, facts that are as plain as the noses on the ends of their faces... if only they would get their heads out of the sand and come to terms with the reality of what talks after talks after talks about any form of BBF are telling them.....

>>>> It's BBF = PARTITION boys and girls, or an arrangement that is one very small and very easy to take step away from it.


Well,dear Bill...

One could say that the GC official position is ...rulers in the south and rulers in the north...by hook or by crook!!!


errr, thanks but we don't need a tc to tell us the occupied areas are ruled by crooks...
User avatar
ZoC
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3280
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:29 pm

Postby boomerang » Tue Oct 26, 2010 2:00 am

and your version of bbf is what exactly?...
User avatar
boomerang
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7337
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 5:56 am

Postby ZoC » Tue Oct 26, 2010 2:06 am

boomerang wrote:and your version of bbf is what exactly?...


u wot?
User avatar
ZoC
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3280
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:29 pm

Postby shahmaran » Tue Oct 26, 2010 2:06 am

ZoC wrote:
boomerang wrote:and your version of bbf is what exactly?...


u wot?


Go on ZoC, lets hear it! :lol:
User avatar
shahmaran
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5461
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:58 pm
Location: In conflict

Postby ZoC » Tue Oct 26, 2010 2:09 am

shahmaran wrote:
ZoC wrote:
boomerang wrote:and your version of bbf is what exactly?...


u wot?


Go on ZoC, lets hear it! :lol:


bbf? isn't that a Roald Dahl children's book?
User avatar
ZoC
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3280
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:29 pm

Postby bill cobbett » Tue Oct 26, 2010 2:44 am

BirKibrisli wrote:
bill cobbett wrote:
boulio wrote:
EU member or not the result is the same no help from the international community speaks volumes to those who want to understand. Ask any TC you want to choose between becoming a minority under gc rule or the current situation and becoming Turkish the majority Would no hesitation in choosing the latter.


but thats why there was a offer for a federal model for cyprus for the last 35 years.but the turks want to be rulers in the north and partners in the south.Sorry thats not happening.


Yes, very well said... in a few words, sums up why a BBF plan will always be rejected by the more realistic amongst us...

"... rulers in the north and partners in the south.... "

Shame that there are a few foolish people around, mis-guided wishful thinkers, living in cloud cuckoo land with their heads in the clouds who can't accept these few very truthful words and who refuse to accept realities, the facts on the ground and in the history of the past fifty-five years, facts that are as plain as the noses on the ends of their faces... if only they would get their heads out of the sand and come to terms with the reality of what talks after talks after talks about any form of BBF are telling them.....

>>>> It's BBF = PARTITION boys and girls, or an arrangement that is one very small and very easy to take step away from it.


Well,dear Bill...

One could say that the GC official position is ...rulers in the south and rulers in the north...by hook or by crook!!!

It is crystal clear now that the GC deep state cannot be trusted..The mentality that renegated on the Constitutional agreement before the ink was dry in 1960 ,and went on to prepare a little plan called Akritas to rob the TCs of any power,is alive and well,and living in some female UN official's underpants stealing UN documents on negotiations... :lol:

The TCs need a foolproof and watertight solution to be safe from the deep GC state...The BBF is the best you can hope for...When you finally come to your senses and realise that the sun does not shine out of your arses!!! :wink:


Oh dear it's the Akreeeetarse Plan again! .... Things must be getting desperate if Bir is resorting to bringing that worthless, discredited bit of trash up again, and for the second time in a couple of days....... :roll:

...... and then he goes on about .... a Deep GC State!!!!! .... insane, absolutely insane...

and when he refers to ..... "water-tight" and "fool-proof" and ... "safe" .... well, all that can be said is ...... OMG !!!!!!!! :shock: :shock: :shock: ....

Mr Bir has transformed in to...... Dr VP !!!! ... and given us another very good reason to be suspicious of the motives behind some people's passion for a bbf-based settlement. ............. :wink:

Reh Bir...... a few questions for you.... about your highly prized Agreeetarse....

1. How many people did it harm/kill???????

2. How many people were ethnically cleansed by it?????

3. Oh, and while we're at is >>> What Year Is It??????? (Or come to think of it, >>> what Century and what Planet are we living in and on? . :roll:
User avatar
bill cobbett
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15759
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Embargoed from Kyrenia by Jurkish Army and Genocided (many times) by Thieving, Brain-Washed Lordo

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests