The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Christofias and the Annan Plan

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby shahmaran » Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:33 pm

paliometoxo wrote:ah yes we are the racist ones the bastards and the turks are the perfect ones. its all our fault your right...


Our government has no record of racism nor religiousness.

Bastards maybe though :lol:
User avatar
shahmaran
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5461
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:58 pm
Location: In conflict

Postby Hermes » Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:35 pm

shahmaran wrote:
Not doing it would not have changed the fact that the people running the South are indeed racist religious bastards.

That's what the real war is about.


Er... that is why the ROC is a thriving member of the European Union and Turkey is pals with Islamist nutters like Sudan, Hezbollah, Hamas and Iran.

How are all those imams that the AKP has been bringing into the north? Are you all good Muslims now?
User avatar
Hermes
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2837
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:55 pm
Location: Mount Olympus

Postby bill cobbett » Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:36 pm

boulio wrote:
EU member or not the result is the same no help from the international community speaks volumes to those who want to understand. Ask any TC you want to choose between becoming a minority under gc rule or the current situation and becoming Turkish the majority Would no hesitation in choosing the latter.


but thats why there was a offer for a federal model for cyprus for the last 35 years.but the turks want to be rulers in the north and partners in the south.Sorry thats not happening.


Yes, very well said... in a few words, sums up why a BBF plan will always be rejected by the more realistic amongst us...

"... rulers in the north and partners in the south.... "

Shame that there are a few foolish people around, mis-guided wishful thinkers, living in cloud cuckoo land with their heads in the clouds who can't accept these few very truthful words and who refuse to accept realities, the facts on the ground and in the history of the past fifty-five years, facts that are as plain as the noses on the ends of their faces... if only they would get their heads out of the sand and come to terms with the reality of what talks after talks after talks about any form of BBF are telling them.....

>>>> It's BBF = PARTITION boys and girls, or an arrangement that is one very small and very easy to take step away from it.
User avatar
bill cobbett
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15759
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Embargoed from Kyrenia by Jurkish Army and Genocided (many times) by Thieving, Brain-Washed Lordo

Postby boulio » Mon Oct 25, 2010 7:52 pm

bill i think there could have been a true federal model in cyprus even with bbf criteria however the north would need to be reduced to probably 22-23% with the vast majority of refugees coming under a southern state(g/c)and in the northern state(t/c)you would have a turkish majority,however the g/c that would return north would need to have all the same rights as the t/c do for it to be a federal solution.plus no restrictions.
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby MrH » Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:20 pm

Boulio and Bill,

Are you both smoking drugs together up some tree? Explain to me how you will get this wishful solution, please!
User avatar
MrH
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1090
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 12:18 pm
Location: London

Postby boulio » Mon Oct 25, 2010 8:29 pm

why whats the problem MR.H ?You will have a t/c majority state in the north(which will be within EU guidline concerning laws)by reducing the north state to 22-23%like i said the vast majority of g/c would be under a g/c state hence vastly reducing the issue of property(christofias made in my opinion a mistake should have negotiated territory first and then the property)thus having BBF ,BI ZONAL does not mean pure ethnic state.
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby bill cobbett » Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:04 pm

boulio wrote:bill i think there could have been a true federal model in cyprus even with bbf criteria however the north would need to be reduced to probably 22-23% with the vast majority of refugees coming under a southern state(g/c)and in the northern state(t/c)you would have a turkish majority,however the g/c that would return north would need to have all the same rights as the t/c do for it to be a federal solution.plus no restrictions.


Think if we were talking a number of zones or cantons (to take a term from past history) we might get somewhere but such, much-used recently, expressions as "two constituent states" leads to only one very dark place.
Last edited by bill cobbett on Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
bill cobbett
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15759
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Embargoed from Kyrenia by Jurkish Army and Genocided (many times) by Thieving, Brain-Washed Lordo

Postby Viewpoint » Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:06 pm

Better get used to it.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby bill cobbett » Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:13 pm

Viewpoint wrote:Better get used to it.


have you amended that very naughty word in your last post VP?
User avatar
bill cobbett
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15759
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Embargoed from Kyrenia by Jurkish Army and Genocided (many times) by Thieving, Brain-Washed Lordo

Postby ZoC » Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:30 pm

Viewpoint wrote:Better get used to it.


u been saying that since 1573. and we never will.
User avatar
ZoC
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3280
Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 6:29 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests