The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Same old crap from turkey

Everything related to politics in Cyprus and the rest of the world.

Same old crap from turkey

Postby gauss » Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:17 pm

Turkish Nationalist Rally In Church Angers Armenians

A high-profile Muslim religious service with government permission, held by Turkey’s leading ultranationalist party in an ancient Armenian church has sent shockwaves through Armenia and its worldwide Diaspora, further reducing the prospects for Turkish-Armenian reconciliation. The resulting uproar will make the Armenian government more cautious in possible US attempts to revive its ill-fated “football diplomacy” with Ankara. The service was also a blow to civil society efforts to break enduring Armenian stereotypes about Turks.

The opposition Nationalist Movement Party (MHP) rallied hundreds of supporters on October 1 for a Friday prayer service at the eleventh century Holy Virgin cathedral in Ani, the once thriving capital of a medieval Armenian kingdom, less than two weeks after a landmark Christian liturgy at another Armenian holy site in eastern Turkey. The Turkish government portrayed the September 19 mass at the tenth century Holy Cross church on Akhtamar Island in Lake Van as proof of its goodwill towards the Armenians.

The Akhtamar church fell into disrepair following the 1915 mass killings and deportations of Armenians in the Ottoman Empire, which many countries and historians regard as the first genocide of the twentieth century. It was thoroughly renovated and turned into a state museum in March 2007. The Turkish government, which spent $1.5 million on the renovation, has since resisted calls to return the church to its previous owner, the Istanbul Patriarchate of the Armenian Apostolic Church. It has only allowed Turkey’s remaining Armenian community to hold religious serves on the tiny island once a year.

Ankara’s failure to honor its reported pledge to restore a cross at the top of the temple by September 19 provided another source of controversy, leading many Armenians to dismiss the event as a publicity stunt. Turkish authorities quietly placed the cross back on the church dome on September 30 (Yerkir-Media TV, www.tert.am), a development that was completely overshadowed by the “namaz,” or Muslim prayer, in Ani on the following day.

The MHP made no secret of the fact that the prayer service was a response to the Akhtamar mass. The party’s senior leader, Devlet Bahceli, personally led a crowd of several hundred nationalists into the ruins of Ani, located on the Turkish-Armenian border, to the accompaniment of Ottoman military marches played by a Janissary-style brass band. Turkish television images showed the crowd waving Turkish flags and chanting “Allahu Akbar” (God is great) before saying prayers in and around the Armenian cathedral.

One of the largest Armenian churches of the Middle Ages, the cathedral was first consecrated in 1001 after more than a decade of construction ordered by Armenian Bagratid King, Smbat II, and completed by his successor’s wife, Queen Katranide. Seljuk Sultan Alparslan is believed to have converted it into a mosque when he conquered Ani and much of medieval Armenia in 1064. Turkish sources still refer to it as Fethiye Mosque.

Although some senior figures in Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP) reportedly disapproved of the MHP action, it was sanctioned by the authorities in Ankara and the northeastern Kars region encompassing Ani (CNN-Turk, Anatolia News Agency, September 30). A local Sunni Muslim cleric was authorized to lead the service from a makeshift podium erected inside the cathedral. The official stamp of approval only stoked the Armenian anger.

Officials in Yerevan declined to comment on the ceremony, leaving it to the Echmiadzin-based Mother See of the Armenian Apostolic Church to condemn it in unusually strong terms. In a written statement issued on October 2, the office of the church’s supreme leader, Catholicos Garegin II, implicated the Turkish government in the “political provocation that has nothing to do with … religious freedom,” adding that“the Turkish authorities are continuing their steps aimed at destroying Armenian monuments and misappropriating historical Armenian holy sites and cultural treasures. It is also evident that with this step Turkey is once again scuttling efforts by Armenia and the international community to … normalize Turkish-Armenian relations.”

Armenian scholars likewise linked the Turkish nationalist rally with the destruction of traces of the ancient Armenian civilization that had for centuries existed in what is now eastern Turkey. Hundreds of Armenian churches have been destroyed, ransacked or turned into mosques since the 1915 genocide. “We now have reason to be happy,” Samvel Karapetian, an expert on medieval Armenian architecture, commented sarcastically, “For centuries, our churches were desecrated and turned into toilets, whereas now they are only doing a ‘namaz’” (Kapital, October 2). “This is a slap to European civilization,” said Hayk Demoyan, the Director of the Armenian Genocide Museum-Institute (www.panorama.am, October 1).

Diaspora Armenian reaction was no less scathing, with the Coordination Council of Armenian organizations of France (CCAF) calling for international condemnation of the “profanation” of the Ani temple. “The Turkish authorities have once again lent themselves to an explosive exploitation of religious sentiments for nationalist aims,” the Paris-based umbrella group said in a statement (www.armenews.com, October 2).

The Ani service will likely make Armenia’s leadership even more suspicious of Ankara in the future. Ankara was already reeling from the collapse of the US-brokered normalization agreements signed by the two governments in Zurich one year ago. The Turkish side subsequently made their parliamentary ratification conditional on a resolution of the Karabakh conflict acceptable to Azerbaijan.

Armenian President, Serzh Sargsyan, responded by formally suspending the ratification process in Armenia’s parliament in April. The move failed to placate Armenian critics of his conciliatory line on Turkey which had been strongly endorsed by the West and the US in particular. Visiting Yerevan in July, US Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, praised Sargsyan for not formally annulling the Turkish-Armenian agreements and urged Ankara to honor them. Turkish Foreign Minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, reaffirmed however, the Karabakh linkage in a speech delivered at Harvard University last week (www.armenialiberty, September 29).
gauss
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 2:46 pm
Location: drifting through the capitals of tin

Postby insan » Sat Oct 09, 2010 6:02 pm

Namaz in Ani church: eye for eye, tooth for tooth
October 04, 2010 | 12:12

Mutlu Tombekci, an analyst for the Turkey-based Vatan newspaper, severely criticized Devlet Bahçeli, the leader of the Nationalist Movement Party (MHP), who, together with his supporters, performed a namaz at Ani church in protest at the liturgy in Surb Khach church on Akhtamar Island.

“Some asked why the ‘liberals’, who attended the liturgy at the Armenian church on Akhtamar Island, did not take part in the namaz in Ani chuch. My answer to them is:

“1. The permission for a liturgy at the Sümela Monastery in Trabzon was granted in December 2009, eight months before the 2010 liturgy.

“The permission for annual liturgies on Akhtamar Island was granted on March 25, 2010, seven months before the September 19 liturgy.

“As regards the unsanctioned namaz at Ani, I knew about it two days before. They got permission within 12 hours and performed namaz the following day. I did not understand the reason for their haste as well. Days run out? Only Bahçeli and his mob knew about the namaz just three days before?

“2. There is a great difference between the namaz at Ani and the liturgy in Surb Khach on Akhtamar Island.

“Ani Church is not a Muslim sacred place. Did Armenians hold a liturgy at a mosque that had been turned into a church? It is an Armenian church. Armenians built this church 1,000 years ago, and it served as an office of the patriarchate. They wished to hold a liturgy at a renovated church and had been waiting for it for three years. They got a permission and, as normal people, informed everybody of that. Everybody made their plans accordingly, and we went to observe the liturgy. One more thing: in what place of your country you cannot perform namaz? How many Muslims have to this day known about Ani? I tell you. None!

“3. Why was I to act like a child? Why Ani? Why in an Armenian city? Why a church turned into a mosque? Even to this day no sign in Ani contains the word ‘Armenian’, but it is another topic. But Bahçeli’s gang knew it was Armenian.

“The namaz performed by the Turkish nationalists did not look sincere at all. It followed the ‘eye for eye, tooth for tooth’ principle. It was full of hate and smacked of revenge.

“So what you say. If you perform namaz not in Ani, but in the Voyvoda mosque, which was turned into a museum of Greek folk art in Athens. You will say: we have permission, let us go. You should know, I would be happy to come with you. We will perform namaz in the Greek capital and have kebab at an Armenian restaurant thereby giving them an answer.

“Come on, turn to the Athens Mayor for permission to perform namaz. Kebab at my expense, and do not be afraid – I will not treat you pork,” Mutlu Tömbekçi writes in her article.

The article evoked a wide response throughout Turkey. A number of journalists were highly critical of it in their articles.

http://news.am/eng/news/33098.html

Although the real muslims recognize the church and all previous prophets as sacred and can practice the religious practices of their religion in them without feeling any uneasiness; it is obvious that a bunch of ultra-nationalist-islamist group by disguising itself behind this reality chose the Ani church for Friday prayers for a well known political purpose... it was ill-intentioned... that's what made it intolerable...
User avatar
insan
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 9044
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2003 11:33 pm
Location: Somewhere in ur network. ;]

Postby Oracle » Sat Oct 09, 2010 9:10 pm

"Turkey" must be the only country which still behaves in such an uncivilised fashion. Soon, it will come to realise it does not fit in where it wants. The established relationships of naturally acclimatised countries in the region, tied firmly through millennial neighbourly co-habitation, are longer lasting than the tentative pseudo-friendships Turkey quickly makes only to renege on even faster.


Iran is Armenia’s close friend, Serzh Sargsyan says

October 09, 2010

On October 9, Armenian President Serzh Sargsyan received Iranian delegation headed by Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani.

The President expressed confidence that Larijani’s visit to Armenia will contribute to further expansion of friendly relations between the states, RA Presidential press service informed NEWS.am. “Our people consider your nation as an old, reliable and close friend. I am glad that our present relations are at a good level. We attach importance to a high-level dialogue between both countries’ leadership and mutual visits,” Sargsyan said.

Ali Larijani noted that Armenian-Iranian relations can be a good basis for maintaining stability in the region. He also pointed out construction of North-South transport corridor, adding that creation of a new transit corridor will be profitable for everyone.

The sides stressed importance of implementation of the following strategic projects: Iran-Armenia railway, joint hydro power station on Araks River, the third Armenia-Iran high-voltage transmission line, as well as construction of an oil products pipeline.

President Sargsyan and Ali Larijani also stressed that efficient cooperation between both countries’ parliaments contributes to establishment of warm relations between Armenia and Iran.
User avatar
Oracle
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 23507
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:13 am
Location: Anywhere but...

Postby lola-tulip » Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:03 pm

Definitely, Iran is dissociating itself from Turkey and such practices.
It is revealing how, so quickly, Iran is forming ties with those who have most suffered in the hands of Turkey.

~...~


Cyprus and Iran are willing to promote their ties.

Tehran Times - 11.10.2010

Efstathios Orphanides, the ambassador to Iran, says Nicosia and Tehran are willing to promote their ties.

“There is a desire by both sides to further encourage and promote the cultural, economic and social ties in all levels for the benefit of the people of Cyprus and Iran,” he added.


http://www.balkans.com/open-news.php?uniquenumber=74157
User avatar
lola-tulip
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 235
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 11:44 pm
Location: Hopeless drifter.


Return to Politics and Elections

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest