The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Papadopoulos and Christofias: the patriot and the fool.

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Papadopoulos and Christofias: the patriot and the fool.

Postby yialousa1971 » Sat Oct 02, 2010 8:40 am

http://hellenicantidote.blogspot.com/2010/09/papadopoulos-and-christofias-patriot.html

Papadopoulos and Christofias: the patriot and the fool. And recalling Tassos Markou

There’s some controversy in Cyprus and Greece at the moment regarding the stupid comments made by President Christofias at the Brookings Institute, during which he stated that both Greece and Turkey ‘invaded’ Cyprus in 1974. I don’t want to get into the details of why this comment is so ridiculous other than to point out that Christofias is an idiot and his English appalling and his comments have to be understood in this context. (See here for full transcript).

I did, however, want to compare the embarrassing comments from Christofias with those I found recently made by Christofias’ predecessor as president, Tassos Papadopoulos, speaking at a Cyprus Federation of America event in New York in September 2004 (a few months after the ‘NO’ vote against the Annan Plan) which was held to honour Tassos Markou, who fought the British as an EOKA leader, the Turkish Cypriots in 1963 and the Turkish invaders in 1974, since when he has been missing. I believe Papadopoulos’ comments below are a truer reflection of the sentiments of Cypriot Hellenism than the communist claptrap Christofias comes out with.

It is a difficult and solemn task to address you at this event bestowing honour on Lieutenant General Tassos Markou. It is he, who has the right to judge us for everything we have done or failed to do, in defense of our homeland and national freedom, due to his accomplishments and ethos.

It is not we, who bestow rightful honour to a true fighter of freedom and virtue, such as Tassos Markou, for it is we who are honoured by our participation in this event.

On the morning of the 15th of August 1974, we lost trace of the heroic, then Colonel Tassos Markou, and from that moment he joined the ranks of the martyred missing persons.

It is for this reason that I would firstly like to address the relatives of the Lieutenant General; his wife, his two children, his sisters and brothers; who since August of 1974, along with thousands of other relatives of the missing, have been enduring the drama of the uncertainty of their fate.

Feel blessed and find comfort in the knowledge that a member of your family is unique amongst the unique, as he is endowed with all the virtues that justify a person as Greek.

Feel blessed and find comfort in that you had the joy of living together with and close to such a man, even for those few years between his manhood to the day he became a missing person.

For we should be conscious and always remember, that life is not measured by its length but by its intensity. It is not how few or many years we live that matters, but rather the content we give to our existence and with how much intensity and conscientiousness we define our journey and our dedication to virtues, ethos, and ideals.

The ancient saying ‘it is the greatest virtue to defend one's homeland’ was pivotal in the life of Tassos Markou.

And for us Greeks, there is no greater ideal than faith in freedom and dedication to our homeland.
He believed in this with fervour and intensity and this ideal became a beacon that guided his life and journey.

Both in words and deeds he proved himself to be conscientious to the principle and guidelines of life, that he himself with virtue voluntarily selected as his way of life, both in the way he fought and lived.

The hour he chose to remain and fight for his ancestral land at Mia Milia in the defensive line and not to retreat, he was acting in accordance with his guidelines of life. At that moment of decision he called upon and concentrated all the history and greatness of Hellenism in such a way that even if he lives a thousand years more, that hour will remain his finest.

His actions and his life, and not I, are the infallible witness that he dedicated his life to the service for his homeland and the defense of his forefathers’ land.

In 1954, while still an adolescent, and a pupil at the Greek gymnasium in Famagusta, he envisioned serving his homeland as a soldier and studying at the Evelpidon Military Academy. After the start of the EOKA liberation struggle and while the colonial power was searching for him for his involvement with EOKA, he managed to escape to Athens and realize his dream and enlist in the Evelpidon Military Academy.

Before graduation he heard the call of his own struggling homeland and returned to Cyprus in 1958, during difficult times for the freedom struggle, to serve as the head of the Kythraia contingent once again as select amongst the selected.

I don’t intend to refer to his biography or to enumerate his national actions.

First of all because his overwhelming personality and accomplishments are too large to be condensed in this narrow confines or to the few minutes that I have at my disposal for a speech bestowing honour to such a great son of Cyprus and also because I know that the enumeration of virtues and his heroic behaviour, conflicts with the sense of modesty that distinguishes those who are celebrated more for their actions and less for the praise of others.

It is this remarkable and unique man, that the Cyprus Federation of America had the wise idea and commendable initiative to honour by organizing this event on the occasion of my presence in New York. I warmly congratulate the President, the Council and the members of the Federation for their idea and decision to honour the distinguished fighter and soldier Tassos Markou, thirty whole years from the day that his anxious voice was heard for the last time on his walkie-talkie from the first line of defense at Mia Milia, outside Nicosia, on 15th August 1974.

I met him for the first time in November of 1958, when we were together for a short time in a Nicosia hideout during the EOKA struggle. Ever since then, I became connected to him with a close, true, unshakeable friendship that was always accompanied with mutual admiration and honest, open communication.

I met him for the final time on the 30th of July 1974, in Nicosia, which was suffering from the coup d’etat and the invasion and had become a city of pain and anguish.

I remember as if it were yesterday – our dramatic meeting and conversation and his last words still ring in my ears “Goodbye my brother. I am leaving now and going to the front. I do not think you will see me again.”

During those dramatic moments of the Turkish Cypriot insurrection of 1963, he proved himself to be a worthy soldier, a unique leader and a brave fighter who voluntarily undertook and accomplished the most risky of missions.

Those who know him and served with him in the National Guard, those who know him as a senior officer and as a man, speak of his integrity. They characterize him as a man of principle, dedicated to his ideals and beliefs, who had an unwavering and uncompromising boldness of opinion in what he believed to be correct and true towards persons of authority and others.

Dedicated in the carrying out of his duties, that he always accomplished in full, even to the point of treating himself harshly. Simultaneously humble, approachable and humane towards his inferiors and his soldiers who adored him as a decisive leader and stable supporter in their personal and private problems.

His lithe stature, nobility of personality, and the ethos he exuded spontaneously from his simple presence and beauty, compete only with the beauty of his soul and virtue. The peak of his contribution was his stance during the 1974 coup d’etat and the invasion.

When the coup d’etat broke out, he left with permission from his unit in Kythraia, anxiously seeking support to avoid the worst that was to follow, as he correctly predicted and foresaw, i.e the Turkish invasion.

It was a concise and correct judgment that the invasion was previously agreed on and what Cyprus was facing was a predetermined scenario for the partition of Cyprus. He fought with bravery and with all the strength he had, even when he was alone and helpless against the coup d’etat, against the force of the Turkish invader and even when he knew he did not have the ability or hope of overcoming them.

He fought for freedom, democracy and legality against the coup d’etat of the treacheous junta.
He remained where his homeland called upon him to be. And there he remained. And since then he is missing.

The enemy has passed but remains in Cyprus, as an aggressor and occupier for thirty whole years. And we, the betrayed and unjustly treated Greeks of Cyprus seek for thirty whole years the fundamental, natural and obvious right to live freely in a reunited homeland without occupation troops, without settlers, without the walls of separation, without refugees, missing and the enclaved. We seek simple justice and simple justification.

Some accuse us of being rejectionists and unrealistic when we refuse to accept the absurd and unfair, that they characterize as, supposedly, ‘fair’ and ‘uniquely balanced’ resolution of the Cyprus problem.

They use as a threat the suffering and difficulties that will arise, supposedly, because the great majority of our people decided on the 24th of April to say ‘NO’ to a Plan which as it was did not secure a workable and viable solution.

They say that they respect the democratic right of the People to decide their fate. But when the large majority of the people, 76%, freely, democratically and fully-informed voted ‘NO’, in deed and words they do not respect the verdict of the people or the majority of the people. On the contrary they mock the decision and exercise psychological terror upon the great majority of the people or they just project real or invented dangers that are incited, supposedly, from the ‘NO’ vote in order to indirectly promote a ‘YES’.

They don’t say however, as honesty and conscientiousness of word and deed requires, how much the same and worse dangers and difficulties would have been avoided or would have been worse and multiplied if we had voted ‘YES’.

Voting ‘NO’ the people did not reject a solution to the Cyprus problem. They did not vote against the reunification of our homeland. They rejected this specific Plan, which amongst other things perpetuated divisive tendencies and institutions instead of bringing about reunification and unity.

We are committed and dedicated to a bizonal, bicommunal federal solution that would bring about the reunification of our homeland which would be workable, viable and make a reality the gradual rapprochement of the communities in Cyprus, the social and economic reunification and which will not institute the division of the communities and institutions.

Those who threaten with dangers and who describe the products of their own fears as realism, seem to be unable to be inspired by the example of the life and struggle of people such as Tassos Markou.

Posted by John Akritas at Thursday, September 30, 2010
User avatar
yialousa1971
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6260
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 2:55 pm
Location: With my friends on the Cyprus forum

Postby nick dimitri » Sat Oct 02, 2010 9:50 am

Yialousa 1971,

No one should undermine those who gave their lives and those who still today fighting with one way or another for the good of Cyprus. Bud can you tell me what Tassos Papadopoulos really achieved as President of Cyprus apart of
one big "NO" and a few tears in front of the telly? If it wasn't for Christofias he wouldn't have been a President any way and as for who took part in the invasion of Cyprus everybody knows. I'm asking you WHAT GREECE HAVE DONE TO PREVENT IT as I haven't herd of any of their F16 fighters chasing the enemy's.
nick dimitri
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 10:48 am

Postby miltiades » Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:39 am

nick dimitri wrote:Yialousa 1971,

No one should undermine those who gave their lives and those who still today fighting with one way or another for the good of Cyprus. Bud can you tell me what Tassos Papadopoulos really achieved as President of Cyprus apart of
one big "NO" and a few tears in front of the telly? If it wasn't for Christofias he wouldn't have been a President any way and as for who took part in the invasion of Cyprus everybody knows. I'm asking you WHAT GREECE HAVE DONE TO PREVENT IT as I haven't herd of any of their F16 fighters chasing the enemy's.

The bloody cowards in the Greek army did not have the balls to take on a protective role and help Cyprus . The bollocks that we were all fed with as children ie I Ellada pote then bla bla bla have been exposed as utter rubbish.
The army was in charge in Greece at the time of the invasion by Turkey , an invasion which the fucking Greeks initiated and when it happened they were .... having a fucking rest. This bloody nation has cost Cyprus a great deal , it procured the biggest catastrophe that our island has ever endured .
Go to hell bloody Greeks , conman , undisciplined . selfish peasants.
LONG LIVE THE ETHNOS OF CYPRUS.
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Postby nick dimitri » Sat Oct 02, 2010 10:56 am

miltiades,

I know all these and you're absolutely right, I was referring to Yialousa 's comments file mou.
nick dimitri
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 10:48 am

Postby miltiades » Sat Oct 02, 2010 11:23 am

nick dimitri wrote:miltiades,

I know all these and you're absolutely right, I was referring to Yialousa 's comments file mou.

So was I re parea !!!
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Postby bubblechris » Sat Oct 02, 2010 11:36 am

Yialousa, you and many like you, thankfully a minority overall, are the reason why we are in this mess and why so many heroes died and inocents were murdered by both Greeks and Turks. Too too many died.

Cyprus is an independent Coutry and we wish to keep it that way.

Cypriot brothers, am i right or wrong?
bubblechris
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 6:38 am

Postby nick dimitri » Sat Oct 02, 2010 11:59 am

bubblechris,

You're absolutely right my friend.
nick dimitri
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 10:48 am

Postby miltiades » Sat Oct 02, 2010 1:09 pm

bubblechris wrote:Yialousa, you and many like you, thankfully a minority overall, are the reason why we are in this mess and why so many heroes died and inocents were murdered by both Greeks and Turks. Too too many died.

Cyprus is an independent Coutry and we wish to keep it that way.

Cypriot brothers, am i right or wrong?

Bubble&.... you are bloody right mate , these kalamarades aficionados are the reason our northern part is now occupied , the stupid plonkers can not see the damage that they are inflicting on Cyprus by persistently denying the Cypriot nation.
LONG LIVE CYPRUS , THE ONLY ETHNOS FOR THE CYPRIOT PEOPLE !
User avatar
miltiades
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 19837
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:01 pm

Postby bubblechris » Sat Oct 02, 2010 1:22 pm

What pisses me off even more is the sick psychos who run the Disy part. Anastiades and his cohorts should all be charged with treason. None of them want a solution they just want to keep what's theirs and what they have pinched from us. Abhorrent Bastards :@ all of them.
bubblechris
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 6:38 am

Postby nick dimitri » Sat Oct 02, 2010 1:49 pm

bubblechris wrote <What pisses me off.......>

File mou I have to disagree with you here. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion and ideas in any political Party, but of course as long as their actions do not harm others.
nick dimitri
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2010 10:48 am

Next

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests