Paphitis wrote:I understand you like or support him, and there is nothing wrong with that. I support him as well, and really hope he gets his act together and solves the Cyprus Problem as well as preserve the fundamental human and democratic rights of the Cypriot people and not make things worse. I think this is what we all want!
But there are some differences of opinion. You think he is good, I think he is bad! Therefore, it would be nice if you can tell me exactly what it is you believe is so good about his handling of the Cyprus Issue. Those of us that have lost our faith in this man would very much appreciate it, and if you can show us some of the silver lining, then perhaps you might convince some of us to be less harsh on him.
There are naturally no right or wrong answers. Just differences in opinion!
Anyway, this has been a nice exchange. It is a real shame that some go out of their way to ruin things for everyone!
It is a matter of differences of opinion, as you say, but also differences in attitude. I didn't raise my expectations of this government beyond what was humanly possible. And he hasn't actually failed us. To criticise him already, midway, is to undermine the democratic process, insult his voters and prematurely condemn him when his job is clearly not finished. The label "Communist" is anachronistic since he isn't -- but the label has stuck, and it irks some. He is a socialist (IMO) and that is best for Cyprus at the moment. Being war-torn, inland revenue should be tightly regulated centrally, by necessity. So, his left-leanings are a positive.
I don't think he's stupid. He is at least average or even clever. As an average person myself, I can see he has offered the Turks a lot of generous concessions. Why haven't they accepted them? Did you expect them to accept them? I don't think Christofias expected them to. He knows what the Turks want, as well you and I do. They want a permanent, legal, recognised foothold in Cyprus. He is NOT giving them that, is he? Instead, he has highlighted their greed. Ashamed, they turn their eyes eastwards. But, the east is changing and Turkey will be isolated. Constitutional changes? What forced them to make such a show of reinvention?
This is why I now think he is not just average but tends to the clever side. He has categorically stated that nothing is decided until everything is decided and that is his catch all loophole should the Turks double-bluff and accept one of his concessions.
Perhaps he is super-clever and so we have to rise to his expectations of us. He keeps reminding us that he is aiming for ONE sovereignty. That is what all (sane) GCs want. But some of us forget, ignore, miss this most important caveat which underpins his every speech to us. It's the idiots (on our side) who run along with every tongue-twister he struggles with and suppose all he says is all that matters ignoring all his actions. Look where he was! Look how much support came from Congress through him being in the US. Turkey could actually be facing US sanctions for the first time ... ever! On our behalf!
Also, I think he is a genuinely warm man. That is my intuition -- and I bet those who spend time with him pick up on this and I feel that a lot of support that has come Cyprus' way recently has a lot to do with those other countries' leaders actually trusting Christophias.
Anyway, I may have to borrow a cup of sugar from him someday
[Paphiti, there is a reason why I've been avoiding long exchanges on the forum these days -- it's fair enough to have a throwaway comment generating 10 posts of shit by gasfart; but I just hate that evil-watched-feeling when you begin to snuggle down for some mind-satisfying, read-between-the-lines dialogues which come from us knowing each other well, only to have some screeching helium filled banshee interrupt and disrupt the flow -- if it continues much more, I shall go back to communicating by PMs again ]