by repulsewarrior » Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:02 pm
...the question Oceanside, is in defining so called gcs and tcs as you say. for many, and in my opinion, Cyprus comes first, are they Greeks or "Greeks", Turks or "Turks". i think you are, like many, confused by the brash patriots who choose to ignore that above all, we are all of the same race, the Human Race, rather than Nationalists strictly devoted to a dogma which profits from an adversarial approach, that promotes fear and hatred for those unlike "them".
...what is "easy", is not necessarily right, dividing the island in two to accomodate this thinking will only lead to the subjugation of Cypriots to a myth promoted by an elite who have no interest in the betterment of their lives as Indivuduals. simply insisting that the vast majority living in Cyprus are Greeks, does not respect the complexities of a population which live in the Modern world, with distinctive identities. but both Greek Cypriots, and Turkish Cypriots must respect this possibility, they must wrest the Agenda from the extremists who seek the status quo, first as a Sovereign People, and secondly in defiance of the sense that Greekness or Turkishness has a place in their representation as Cypriots. it is why so much effort is placed on defining a Principal which is Bicommunal, where there is a State which respects and defends the Rights of its Citizens without distinction or discrimination, as Individuals, and within the State, Cypriot Constituencies which can sustain these Citizens as Persons through another level of Government where they have as such, self-representation.
...to put it another way, 20 million crossings have occured, since the gates were opened, without violence and death, it is hardly true therefore that these people do not want anything to do with each other, they wish to live in peace together. and to put it even more simply, your observation is correct, dialog will make this impasse eventually a thing of the past.