The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


'Human Rights' Group endorses TRNC recognition

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby Nikitas » Fri Oct 08, 2010 9:40 am

Some people are not getting it. The European Convention of Human Rights recognises the right of ownership of property. The EU basic legal order incorporates the ECHR, and extends it by establishing rights of free movement, establishment and residence.

In other words no matter how many troops the Turks have in Cyprus, and wheter VP is a Cypriot or not, something he/she must prove, my rights to my land and my patrimony cannot be altered by anyone.

Those who think that a few decades of foreign occupation will change things do not know Cypriots and have not read the history of Cyprus. Read the history of Lambousa. It will enlighten you.

We do not forget.
Nikitas
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 7420
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2007 2:49 pm

Postby Murataga » Tue Oct 12, 2010 7:19 am

Nikitas wrote:Some people are not getting it. The European Convention of Human Rights recognises the right of ownership of property. The EU basic legal order incorporates the ECHR, and extends it by establishing rights of free movement, establishment and residence.

In other words no matter how many troops the Turks have in Cyprus, and wheter VP is a Cypriot or not, something he/she must prove, my rights to my land and my patrimony cannot be altered by anyone.

Those who think that a few decades of foreign occupation will change things do not know Cypriots and have not read the history of Cyprus. Read the history of Lambousa. It will enlighten you.

We do not forget.


Good, than remember these too:

We are not invaders, we are Turkish Cypriots. It is YOU who became the invaders of this island when you attacked us to hand the island over to Greece. It is YOU who became the aggressor when you ousted our elected officials from the parliament. It is YOU who ripped the very fabric of the RoC when you bred and harbored an army in complete contravention to her constitution. And it is YOU who have denied peace on this island unless all of her children submitted to the rule of another country:

From "My Deposition" by Glafcos Clerides
(Alithia Publishing, 1990, Volume III, p. 270)

"I returned to Cyprus and reported to Makarios on my talks in Athens. I asked if, after assurances given by Papadhopoulos, he would agree for article 185 of the 1960 Constitution, which prohibited both ENOSIS and partition, to be incorporated in the new constitution. He raised his arms, which were resting on his desk and said: "You see, Glafcos, these hands, they can cut them off, but I will NOT sign again any Constitution excluding ENOSIS."
User avatar
Murataga
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 824
Joined: Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:32 pm

Postby Gregory » Tue Oct 12, 2010 8:28 am

bigOz wrote:
Get Real! wrote:
bigOz wrote:
Get Real! wrote:They don’t know what they’re talking about!

Where is this God damn agreement?

Let me know when you give up and I’ll reveal all…

ise bello re? :shock:
I think its passed your bed time - you are sounding like one of those Sumo wrestlers who is plastered to the ground but still refusing to give up! Talking about blind stubbourness... :lol: :lol: :lol:

Only the agreement itself could possibly qualify as credible evidence and certainly not the hearsay of the junk links you posted!

Do you give up… yes or no?

Here another one from your Russian allies' site:
http://www.regnum.ru/english/708006.html
...The international legal norms (the EU legislation) and the Cyprian national law have worked out a mechanism for protecting the rights of ownership of Greek Cypriots to the property and land left in the north of Cyprus, even though, after the 1974 tragic events and the 1975 Population Exchange Agreement, most of them left the northern part of the island...

All these non-Turkish independent sites including the BBC and the Russians have it wrong? :shock:
Now admit you confused Oz with other TCs you hold discussions with, say you are sorry and go to bed re!

BTW! How many original signed agreements belonging to late 20th century can you locate on the internet? Find me some and I shall waste my time to locate this one for you too! :D :lol:


Minor question here. When 90% of the refugees moved out of their homes in 1974 and the "population exchange agreement" was done in 1975 isn't it time you had a look at the actual agreement and saw that it reffered to the few families that stayed behind?

How the hell do you agree an exchange in 75 when the population already shifted in 74?
User avatar
Gregory
Contributor
Contributor
 
Posts: 402
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 1:11 pm

Postby MrH » Tue Oct 12, 2010 1:58 pm

And Embargoed used to be on the side of The Greek Cypriots until Talat and Christofias messed it all up for them. I guess we now have a full, united, force for Recognition! I wonder what will happen now?
User avatar
MrH
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1090
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2008 12:18 pm
Location: London

Postby CBBB » Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:57 pm

MrH wrote:And Embargoed used to be on the side of The Greek Cypriots until Talat and Christofias messed it all up for them. I guess we now have a full, united, force for Recognition! I wonder what will happen now?


Sweet FA!
User avatar
CBBB
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 11521
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 1:15 pm
Location: Centre of the Universe

Previous

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests