Milo wrote:Schnauzer wrote:Jack M wrote:We can but hope that this father and son double act of crime end up in the cells too then they can deliver all sorts of messages to each other.
As long as they refrain from using obscene language and (if they do not) at least have the good sense not to advertise it on 'You Tube', they may deliver whatever messages they wish.
Well they will have a long time one hopes to think about why any one would dare call them obscene names, especially to ones father (if anyone did) in possible retaliation (if it happened of course) for death threats on wives and children in the UK, sort of makes sense to say that to someone does,nt it?? IF any of these men fathers sons brothers cousins had stolen my money threatened my family and attacked me with three men, calling someone names is a very lightweight retort imo, that would have been the easiest of my responses.
Best news I ,ve heard for sometime. Hope they rot.
I think you are initially trying to imply that Conor did not utter his foul comments (which is a mistake since they are proven fact and the evidence is quite clear) and that secondly, you are attempting to introduce scenarios which did not take place (which is also a mistake since there is no evidence to substantiate them).
If your intention (along with others) is to re-invigorate a lost cause by either attracting sympathy from an audience or creating an entourage of similar deadbeats prepared to follow Conor, may I suggest that you have chosen the wrong forum to attempt such objectives.
Conor thought he was a smart operator, he was not, the only thing smart about him was that he was smart enough to ensure that his personal insult was delivered by telephone.
Had he uttered his foul comment face to face with the Son, he would have had little time left to 'Pitch his tent'. (IMHO)