Cyprus-Forum.com

[lola-tulip]

... They don't call upon Turkey to end the so-called occupation of Cyprus...

Who has affirmed/supported Turkey's occupation? Who else (apart from Turkey) condones this "so-called" occupation?

Hallo insan

Just in case you missed this the first time. I really would like to know.

Hallo insan

I see you are still around.

Have you had time to think?

[Get Real!]

... They don't call upon Turkey to end the so-called occupation of Cyprus...

Who has affirmed/supported Turkey's occupation? Who else (apart from Turkey) condones this "so-called" occupation?

Hallo insan

Just in case you missed this the first time. I really would like to know.

Hallo insan

I see you are still around.

Have you had time to think?

Does an abstention from Pakistan count? I think that's what he's searching the net for...

[insan]

... They don't call upon Turkey to end the so-called occupation of Cyprus...

Who has affirmed/supported Turkey's occupation? Who else (apart from Turkey) condones this "so-called" occupation?

Hallo insan

Just in case you missed this the first time. I really would like to know.

Hallo insan

I see you are still around.

Have you had time to think?

Does an abstention from Pakistan count? I think that's what he's searching the net for...

You life is a waste not your time!

[boomerang]

so insane you gonna answer lola's question? ...

does talk and threats from the azeris count?...

[insan]

so insane you gonna answer lola's question? ...

does talk and threats from the azeris count?...

I guess my posts arrive late to Oz or you have problems with your eyes...

You made a lot of nonsense aka galimatia; as usual...

[insan]

... They don't call upon Turkey to end the so-called occupation of Cyprus...

Who has affirmed/supported Turkey's occupation? Who else (apart from Turkey) condones this "so-called" occupation?

Hallo insan

Just in case you missed this the first time. I really would like to know.

None of the impartial government officials of allied countries be it in the western alliance or in the east called Turkey as an invader/occupier in Cyprus... Since there has been no invasion/occupation but a defacto stuation that established as a consequence of decades lasted inter-communal and international strife/armed conflict between primarily the leaderships of GC, TCs, governments of Turkey and Greece and their active supporters; there was no need to affirm/support Turkey's so-called occupation but contribute the solution of the defacto situation by calling upon all concerned parties to negotiate and settle the issue...

Now you answer my question...

Had TCs had nearly the same number of TC national guard and TC reservists as GC have wouldn't you still claim TCs invaded/occupied 36% of Cyprus? Yes you would!

So forget all about Turkey and focus on the essentials of the issue...

[boomerang]

so insane you gonna answer lola's question? ...

does talk and threats from the azeris count?...

I guess my posts arrive late to Oz or you have problems with your eyes...

You made a lot of nonsense aka galimatia; as usual...

spanking the monkey in public as per usual insane...spank, spank away...

[lola-tulip]

... They don't call upon Turkey to end the so-called occupation of Cyprus...

Who has affirmed/supported Turkey's occupation? Who else (apart from Turkey) condones this "so-called" occupation?

Hallo insan

Just in case you missed this the first time. I really would like to know.

None of the impartial government officials of allied countries be it in the western alliance or in the east called Turkey as an invader/occupier in Cyprus... Since there has been no invasion/occupation but a defacto stuation that established as a consequence of decades lasted inter-communal and international strife/armed conflict between primarily the leaderships of GC, TCs, governments of Turkey and Greece and their active supporters; there was no need to affirm/support Turkey's so-called occupation but contribute the solution of the defacto situation by calling upon all concerned parties to negotiate and settle the issue...

Now you answer my question...

Had TCs had nearly the same number of TC national guard and TC reservists as GC have wouldn't you still claim TCs invaded/occupied 36% of Cyprus? Yes you would!

So forget all about Turkey and focus on the essentials of the issue...

Distractions over.

Are you ready to answer the original questions?

1. Who has affirmed/supported Turkey's occupation?

2. Who else (apart from Turkey) condones this "so-called" occupation?

[repulsewarrior]

lol, and welcome lola-t.

[bigOz]

... They don't call upon Turkey to end the so-called occupation of Cyprus...

Who has affirmed/supported Turkey's occupation? Who else (apart from Turkey) condones this "so-called" occupation?

Hallo insan

Just in case you missed this the first time. I really would like to know.

None of the impartial government officials of allied countries be it in the western alliance or in the east called Turkey as an invader/occupier in Cyprus... Since there has been no invasion/occupation but a defacto stuation that established as a consequence of decades lasted inter-communal and international strife/armed conflict between primarily the leaderships of GC, TCs, governments of Turkey and Greece and their active supporters; there was no need to affirm/support Turkey's so-called occupation but contribute the solution of the defacto situation by calling upon all concerned parties to negotiate and settle the issue...

Now you answer my question...

Had TCs had nearly the same number of TC national guard and TC reservists as GC have wouldn't you still claim TCs invaded/occupied 36% of Cyprus? Yes you would!

So forget all about Turkey and focus on the essentials of the issue...

Distractions over.

Are you ready to answer the original questions?

1. Who has affirmed/supported Turkey's occupation?

2. Who else (apart from Turkey) condones this "so-called" occupation?

Your question is so absurd - it cannot be answered sensibly, hence no replies! Can your two functioning brain cxells comprehend that?

No one in the world would support any occupation and that is a fact. Likewise, no one in the world would condone an occupation. Your one sided claim that Turkey is occupying North Cyprus has no face value in EU or the rest of the World! Yes there is a large stock of Turkish army on the island but the reason for their presence is interpreted differently by different nations and people! You say "occupation", we say "protection"...

This should be clear to you by the very fact that no one in the World has/is bringing any official sanctions or political pressure on Turkey to pull out of Cyprus! Not even EU - who seem to be content with the Turkish troops pulling out AFTER a settlement is reached between the two ethnic minorities!

Now go back and bring another dozen UN resolutions no one gives a fluck about!