insan wrote:Kifeas wrote:http://www.haberturk.com/gundem/haber/554417-kibrista-cami-bile-yaktikTMT was not alone in its activities. On the 3rd of December 1963, the EOKA successor, the paramilitary Akritas Organisation (οργάνωσης "Ακρίτας"), bombed the statue of EOKA fighter Markos DrakosAs Richard Patrick observed of the outbreak of inter-communal violence in 1963, 'most Cypriots expected an outbreak of violence to be precipitated by armed extremists'. Both communities' nationalist extremists wanted conflict and tried to create it, but neither wanted to be held responsible for it.
They needed their own community's support, so the extremists wanted their community to believe they were protecting them from others' violence. The paramilitaries didn't want the civilians to know they were not simply failing to protect them, but actually trying to get them harmed in order to excuse their own nationalist violence. 'Had the incident of 21 December not occurred, there can be no doubt that a similar Incident... would have been precipitated'.
http://human-rights-archaeology.blogspo ... -1963.html
What was the difference between the 2 side's extremists? If there's no difference, then condemn the extremists in both EOKA(under the name GC national front after 1960) and TMT...
Right got it now... we're talking false-flag ops.... silly me.
Reh Insan... Looked at that link you give... you ask what is the diff between the 2 sides' extremists.... any chance of giving us a tally, a count of the incidents for our better understanding of who was the more effective in their rotten aims please.