A British German or Zulu could buy and have equal rights but a Gc in his own island would not be able to work in the Tc state or even start a business, let alone be able to voice his/her opinion against the Tc state.
Sotos wrote:Bananiot wrote:GR, the poor fellow, has the illusion that it is possible to solve the Cyprus issue on the basis of "justice and international law". This kind of thinking is totally wrong, because:
a. As history and international diplomacy teach us, disputes and crisises between countries and nations are always tackled and fixed on the basis of strategic interests and the balance of power and never on the basis of the principles of justice.
b. The principles of justice are never static, constant or absolute. On the contrary, they are subject to interpretations which are constantly changing too, according to the strategic and political facts that exist at the time the effort is made at solving the problem.
Cyprus problem can only be solved with war when that becomes possible. Anybody that thinks that Cyprus can be liberated in another way is stupid.
Nikitas wrote:The Turks know full well that they cannot extinguish GC property rights in the north. THey also know that they cannot afford, either in terms of land exchanges or money, to come up with a decent settlement scheme. Not being able to buy or exchange, and seeing that their confiscation via "nationalisation" won't cut it in the EU and in the Council of Europe, they now come up with hair brained "co-development" schemes.
Just look at the irony of the side that has pursues partition and division since 1950, now proposing setting up the Property Development Corporation, to participate in projects in the south.
We sit listening to this madness in these talks and have to suffer the added insults of Turkish FM Davutoglu that we are the side that does not want peace.
wyoming cowboy wrote:Mr. Eroglu neglected to mention that Gc would be restricted from doing business in the Tc state nor be able to buy land or have equal rights, A British German or Zulu could buy and have equal rights but a Gc in his own island would not be able to work in the Tc state or even start a business, let alone be able to voice his/her opinion against the Tc state. Why wouldn't Eroglu mention the violations of civil and human rights thats included in his property proposals......Why doesnt Christofias bring these points up to counter and challenge the Turk regime??
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests