The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


1977-78 high level agreements concerning t/c federal state

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

1977-78 high level agreements concerning t/c federal state

Postby boulio » Fri Sep 17, 2010 5:36 pm

quick question when the t/c federal state was agreed to be created at 28-29% of the north,wasent the agreements also that the rest of the g/c would return after the land adjustments from the 37 to 28-29% roughly 80-90 thousand to a northern federal state administered by the t/c?

With Eroglus current land proposals they are saying only 15% to return to the north.this automaitcally puts the 28-29% agreement that all plans after 1978 have been advocating for a northern federal state in a fedreration to be administetred by t/c in doubt.

If the t/c only want 15% returning to their northern federal state than the land should be reduces accordigly to the amount of refugees allowed to return.
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby bill cobbett » Fri Sep 17, 2010 6:35 pm

Can we go back a bit further when discussing BBFs please?... To the temporary ceasefire during the pause in the the two phases of the TA Invasion, to those meetings in Vienna in latish July 1974, when the threat of a BBF blackmail first reared its ugly head.
User avatar
bill cobbett
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15759
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Embargoed from Kyrenia by Jurkish Army and Genocided (many times) by Thieving, Brain-Washed Lordo

Re: 1977-78 high level agreements concerning t/c federal sta

Postby Jerry » Fri Sep 17, 2010 6:50 pm

boulio wrote:quick question when the t/c federal state was agreed to be created at 28-29% of the north,wasent the agreements also that the rest of the g/c would return after the land adjustments from the 37 to 28-29% roughly 80-90 thousand to a northern federal state administered by the t/c?

With Eroglus current land proposals they are saying only 15% to return to the north.this automaitcally puts the 28-29% agreement that all plans after 1978 have been advocating for a northern federal state in a fedreration to be administetred by t/c in doubt.

If the t/c only want 15% returning to their northern federal state than the land should be reduces accordigly to the amount of refugees allowed to return.


It's how Turkey "negotiates". With a gun to your head it says "accept this offer, if you don't the next one will be worse".

In another 36 years time they will offer a "compromise" - "The Greek Cypriots can keep Paphos"
Jerry
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 4730
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 12:29 pm
Location: UK

Re: 1977-78 high level agreements concerning t/c federal sta

Postby Get Real! » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:02 pm

boulio wrote:...when the t/c federal state was agreed to be created at 28-29% of the north,

Image And then you woke up...
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby boulio » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:05 pm

Im under the assumption that in 77-78 makarios and dektash had actually come to a framework agreement on how a future cprus would look.The one and only time between a head of ROC and the a t/c representitive.You may not agree to a federal model for cyprus however at the end of the day thats what we had and were it is going.My question has to do more with land adjustments and refugees returning(hopefully all of them if they wish).
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby boulio » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:06 pm

GET Real im not sleeping,is that not was was agreed in 1977-78?
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby Get Real! » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:06 pm

boulio wrote:Im under the assumption that in 77-78 makarios and dektash had actually come to a framework agreement on how a future cprus would look.The one and only time between a head of ROC and the a t/c representitive.You may not agree to a federal model for cyprus however at the end of the day thats what we had and were it is going.My question has to do more with land adjustments and refugees returning(hopefully all of them if they wish).

Why don't you get hold of this and READ IT instead of making a fool of yourself?
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby boulio » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:13 pm

so if it was never agreed upon GR for both land and bi-zonality why are they discussing it for the last 30 years?
boulio
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 2575
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 6:45 am

Postby Get Real! » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:14 pm

Of course, had you asked nicely with something like…

“Can someone point to the “1977 High level agreement” and/or explain it to me?”

…instead of making sweeping statements that you no doubt got from a barbecue paper, you’ wouldn’t be wasting your evening searching right now!
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Get Real! » Fri Sep 17, 2010 7:16 pm

But as Oracle often points out… something about Turkish DNA!
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Next

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests