Cyprus-Forum.com

[humanist]

VP

Really depends on where that property is located if its in the current south Cyprus you will not have many takers unless they ciuld sell them right away as TCs do not want to live in the GC south.

forgive me for thinking your a scavenger ... but are implying we fix your properties in the occupied territory?

[Nikitas]

VP said:

"Really depends on where that property is located if its in the current south Cyprus you will not have many takers unless they ciuld sell them right away as TCs do not want to live in the GC south."

So why include the PDC proposals in the official TC position about property? That is the point which confused me. The proposal is for TC properties in the SOUTH to be JOINTLY improved, brought up to the same town planning standards as the adjacent GC areas and exploited in common. Naturally no such proposal is made for GC properties in the north.

You can understand my total confusion about the purpose behind this proposal, so if you know anything please enlighten the rest of us.

[Viewpoint]

VP

Really depends on where that property is located if its in the current south Cyprus you will not have many takers unless they ciuld sell them right away as TCs do not want to live in the GC south.

forgive me for thinking your a scavenger ... but are implying we fix your properties in the occupied territory?

No Im not, its about time you understood what I am saying and not making things up as you go along. You proposed that TCs will return if the GC renovate their properties but whats important is that even thise would not entice many TCs back to live as a minority amongst GCs, they can do that today.

[Viewpoint]

VP said:

"Really depends on where that property is located if its in the current south Cyprus you will not have many takers unless they ciuld sell them right away as TCs do not want to live in the GC south."

So why include the PDC proposals in the official TC position about property? That is the point which confused me. The proposal is for TC properties in the SOUTH to be JOINTLY improved, brought up to the same town planning standards as the adjacent GC areas and exploited in common. Naturally no such proposal is made for GC properties in the north.

You can understand my total confusion about the purpose behind this proposal, so if you know anything please enlighten the rest of us.

Could it be that properties in the south are more delapedated than those in the north so thay have to be brought up to scratch.

[Tony-4497]

The whole idea of "development" of TC properties in the free areas is a byzantine plot - a scum in which GC leadership knowingly participates, in order to try and fool GC property owners.

They realise that TCs own only 12% of land but both the UN and defeatist GC leaders have already decided that they will let them have near-pure TC ownership of 30% of land and 55% of coast (seafront land being worth thousands of times non-seafront).

To find a half-baked excuse to justify the many hundreds of billions of euros they are about to try and STEAL from GC owners, they decided to try and convince us that pigs fly.

They will argue that a plot of TC property is worth many times the worth of the IDENTICAL GC plot, on the basis that WE will assign to the former zones with high build factors and WE will create expensive infrastructure around it etc. In other words, WE (GCs) will add a lot of value to the TC land, while the value of EQUIVALENT GC properties will be reduced or remain the same (i.e. using agricultural, low build-factor zones, no roads, infrastructure etc) - IN ORDER to justify the THEFT.

It is unbelievable that GC leaders are even discussing such issues and it is shocking that the Attorney General is not intervening in order to block this attempted property theft.

[Nikitas]

VP said:

"Could it be that properties in the south are more delapedated than those in the north so thay have to be brought up to scratch."

you are being silly and it is not like you. Delapidated or not what is the need for a PDC? Let the GCs cut their throats and figure out how they will deal with these delapidated areas left behind by the TCs and let them pay the bill too.

And why after years of excaliming to the whole world that the two communities cannot live together and MUST be separated seek a collaboration on this specific sector?

This is not a GC-TC debate now, this is people planning to rip us all off big time!

[Nikitas]

Tony,

There is another factor in this PDC fabrica. If it is incorporated in the settlement it will become part of EU rules, the so called Aquis ( I dislike that word!), and thus protect the PDC and thelocal "developers" from EU competition rules. In short the redevelopment of these areas will be carried out without the benefit of EUwide competitive tenders and transparency rules and limited to the usual major local players.

If I am right about this, then the first reactions will come from EU construction companies, especially big players like the major consulting engineers and town planners.