Get Real! wrote:TC666 wrote:so it's ok to con somebody so long as you use your own property to do it with?
Oh no! I think it’s cuter to con somebody when you don’t even fucking own it!
Get outta here you little punk!
But in reality as the owner had mortgaged the property surly the land did not belong to him either. it belonged to the bank.
there is no doubt that it is cuter to con somebody with the land that does not belong to you, although technically it does becasue they do have land in possession of the roc in the south. tit for tat as they say, but you have not answered a simple question. are you having difficluty understaning it?
Is it or is it not ok to con somebody so long as the land belongs to you.
yes it is or no it is not.