''private property was leased to the Electricity Authority of Cyprus at the beginning of the 1960s and the end of 1975 about the public authority had stopped paying rent.and until 1979 without paying any compensation to save the place
According to information received from the lawyers , real estate, to leave the venue after the Greeks Cypriots Electric Company, with the approval of the authorities is probably the last 31 years in the use of Cypriot Antiquities Department.
Turkish Cypriot goods related to established guardianship agencies about the law in 1991, the Cypriot Parliament passes reminiscent of Rights, "The laws of the functions of to win in the South, the goods have left the Turkish Cypriots, the property adequately protected did not, and some arrangements of goods immigrant or nonimmigrant Cypriots of the need to correct the purpose of serving would be "
the first time, "Chief Public Prosecutor v Ibrahim 1964" case after the Cypriot legal literature in finding "needs doctrine" or 1974 after the existing conditions Cypriot administration in the South foundations and similar goods of dealing in "blank check" gives or arbitrary practices "cevaz does not like "said the interpretation is contrary to international law.
Lawyers Hakkı said'' represent the foundation's property in 1974 in the South 'abandoned property' status was not. For the case until about 1976 the building was then a trustee of Electricity Authority, the money could be charged. In addition, the foundation several times until recently, still own the surrounding buildings, such as the Egyptian embassy building was for lease agreements and property rights would benefit from. Hence the reason the case of private property guardian of Turkish goods at the disposal should be considered in the past and to be available to others is incorrect. Cypriot property in the North is not accepted this argument, even without benefit of a private property without compensation of any expansion needed to serve the Greeks to be free of government institutions can not be a strong case for''.
Murat Metin Hakki, finally ECHR agenda at the amicable solution which resulted Nezir Sofi case by calling attention to that process, 139/91 the law of the weaknesses of the person Cypriot authorities, at least implicitly been accepted and as a result, the past spring, the statutory amendment took place said.
The new arrangements between the striking of a point also, Article 6 A European Human Rights Convention, the provisions of the official authorities in case of infringement to the Turkish Cypriots claim the right to clearly emphasize that expression, these new arrangements the Turkish goods relevant to their ancient Greeks case re-interpretation and the claim being able to said the road could be opened.
If the court process, resulting in the plaintiff against the foundation , the move is expected to issue on the agenda in Strasbourg.
http://www.kibrispostasi.com/index.php/ ... _HABERLERI
