Cyprus-Forum.com

[insan]

The outspoken declarations of policy by Archbishop Makarios and his Greek ministers form the crux of our complaints. On 1*1- March 1971 Archbishop Makarios made a speech at the Greek Cypriot village of Yialoussa in which he emphatically stressed that his policy continues to be Enosis (Union of Cyprus with Greece) in the following terms:
"Cyprus is Greek. Cyprus was Greek since the dawn of its history and will remain Greek. Greek and undivided we have taken it over. Greek and undivided we shall preserve it. Greek and undivided we shall deliver it to Greece."
According to reports published in the local Greek press on l6 March 1971; Archbishop Makarios gave a categorical assurance to certain members of the underground organization; National Front, at a meeting he had with them on 9 March 1971? that he has "never ceased to work for Enosis and that he will never sign an agreement which excludes Enosis".
In the meantime Mr. Komodremos, the Minister of Interior of the Greek Cypriot Administration, has continued to tour the island delivering fiery speeches on Enosis and declaring that the Turks of Cyprus are "guests" in the island and should not Interfere in the affiars of Cyprus. In line with this outspokenness of the leadership the Greek Cypriot press has increased its virulent anti-Turkish and pro-Enosis campaign while the Greek Cypriot administrators have hardened their attitude towards members of the Turkish Cypriot Community. The number of molestations, arrests and trial-treatment on sham charges and questioning of Turks on matters unconnected with such charges, assaulting Turks and indiscriminate search of vehicles owned by Turks who travel in Greek controlled areas have increased considerably.
---------------------------00000000000000000-------------------------

The original online version can be reached from the below link:

http://search.un.org/search?q=kuchuk&bt ... ods_un_org


As i previously told, the hypocrisy of Makarios has no bounds... on one hand he was negotiating with TCs to find out a "just" solution to Cyprus problem and on the other hand still, obviously and publicly pursueing the Enosis policy by provoking both communities in opposite directions...

[Get Real!]

Don't worry about "Kuchuk" as this is the ONLY letter you ever have to worry about...


In 1965 the Secretary-General of the UN summed up the official Turkish Cypriot policy with this paragraph:

"The Turkish Cypriot leaders have adhered to a rigid stand against any measures which might involve having members of the two communities live and work together, or which might place Turkish Cypriots in situations where they would have to acknowledge the authority of Government agents. Indeed, since the Turkish Cypriot leadership is committed to physical and geographical separation of the communities as a political goal, it is not likely to encourage activities by Turkish Cypriots which may be interpreted as demonstrating the merits of an alternative policy. The result has been a seemingly deliberate policy of self-segregation by the Turkish Cypriots" (S/6426).

NB: UN document S/6426 is available upon request.

[Viewpoint]

You GCs always claim enosis was dead, the above proves you wrong and reconfirms the dangers we were facing.

[Oracle]

The only "danger" you were facing was that you might be treated equally in a fair democracy, instead of running rampant like Shahs and Ottoman rulers!

Turks fear fairness!

[insan]

The only "danger" you were facing was that you might be treated equally in a fair democracy, instead of running rampant like Shahs and Ottoman rulers!

Turks fear fairness!

Sure! TCs would have been treated worse than the Greek and GC left! Maybe worse than the Cretan Turks!

[Oracle]

The only "danger" you were facing was that you might be treated equally in a fair democracy, instead of running rampant like Shahs and Ottoman rulers!

Turks fear fairness!

Sure! TCs would have been treated worse than the Greek and GC left! Maybe worse than the Cretan Turks!

Fantasist fool ....

[insan]

Don't worry about "Kuchuk" as this is the ONLY letter you ever have to worry about...


In 1965 the Secretary-General of the UN summed up the official Turkish Cypriot policy with this paragraph:

"The Turkish Cypriot leaders have adhered to a rigid stand against any measures which might involve having members of the two communities live and work together, or which might place Turkish Cypriots in situations where they would have to acknowledge the authority of Government agents. Indeed, since the Turkish Cypriot leadership is committed to physical and geographical separation of the communities as a political goal, it is not likely to encourage activities by Turkish Cypriots which may be interpreted as demonstrating the merits of an alternative policy. The result has been a seemingly deliberate policy of self-segregation by the Turkish Cypriots" (S/6426).

NB: UN document S/6426 is available upon request.

http://www.google.com.tr/#q=The+Turkish ... 1b167fb2a8

Hey Göt Real! Why that paragraph appears only on Hellenic websites and not just a single impartial website? Why it was submited to UNSC by then the permenant Greek representative of UN?

Keep huging the dirty sticks extended to you by the Hellenic propagandists...

Ps: Does the mommy wet his softy delight?

[Nikitas]

What is the matter Insan, have you forgotten the "Turk to Turk" slogan?

Are you implying that TCs were eager to reunite in 1971 but the bad old GCs rejected their overtures?

Give us a break!

[insan]

What is the matter Insan, have you forgotten the "Turk to Turk" slogan?

Are you implying that TCs were eager to reunite in 1971 but the bad old GCs rejected their overtures?

Give us a break!

All i meant was, in it's essential; there was no difference between the political attitudes, fears, official and hidden agendas etc... if so, why the GC administration was granted the legitimacy but TC administration not?

The answer is simple... the arts and wiles of politics and besides the international conjecture was favoring the GC position in a hope TCs,GCs, Turks and Greeks would sort out their main differences, reconcile and unite on common grounds in frame of their national interests and the interests of the west... but so far they failed...

[Pyrpolizer]

What is the matter Insan, have you forgotten the "Turk to Turk" slogan?

Are you implying that TCs were eager to reunite in 1971 but the bad old GCs rejected their overtures?

Give us a break!

All i meant was, in it's essential; there was no difference between the political attitudes, fears, official and hidden agendas etc... if so, why the GC administration was granted the legitimacy but TC administration not?

The answer is simple... the arts and wiles of politics and besides the international conjecture was favoring the GC position in a hope TCs,GCs, Turks and Greeks would sort out their main differences, reconcile and unite on common grounds in frame of their national interests and the interests of the west... but so far they failed...

No, it was because the GCs were the 82% majority, and it is always natural that a Government made by a an 82% majority to be considered legal and acceptable in the World we live in.

Similarly for the same reasons any self proclaimed "government" made by minorities is usually ignored, unless the majority grants them autonomy.

In addition to these reasons, what happened in 1974 makes your "administration" an entity based on theft, illegality, and human rights violations, so even those little chances you might have had to get autonomy in your own teriitories got vaporised, because the territory you now live in is nothing but stolen GC land and properties.