insan wrote:Get Real! wrote:insan wrote:Get Real! wrote:insan wrote:... another illegal activity of UN is to recognize the GC administration as the sole representative of the RoC in order to exploit Greece's strategic status more and more...
It's not the UN's job to chase after "Turkish Cypriots" who saw fit to abandon their posts [size=9]
Well... at that point the stupid TC leadership couldn't get aware of that according to the AKRITAS plan they would have been presented to the world as if they abandoned their posts...
Had TCs had a better team AKRITAS(masters of arts and wiles of politics); the Cyprus problem would have been history very long ago... The result would have either been a united Cyprus where TCs and GCs had political equality as 2 communities or partition where the 2 communities lived as 2 allied neighbours...
Are you denying that Turkey had ordered the TMT to ensure that “Turkish Cypriots” break away from Greek Cypriots, in government, employment, and every other mixed activity, and seek “refuge” in specially setup TC enclaves?
Ismet Inönü, then the PM of Turkey said the otherwise in his letter...
The TC reaction against the 13 amendments of Makarios that were obviously an attempt to degrade TCs into something they had never wished and struggled/fought against; was a resentment and opened the old wounds still bleeding since the late 50s...
What if TCs hadn't abandoned their posts at all costs? Politically, it would have been the right step to show the whole world that what TCs wanted was a united RoC where TCs have had the political equality as a community....
... but under then the circumstances that nationalism and illiteracy were the driving force of TC leadership; they couldn't manage to play the game according to the correct rules... On the other hand; team AKRITAS played the game better than TC leadership and succeeded to create an impression that TCs abandoned their posts out of the blue as if the intention of GC leadership was not degrading TCs into a ineffective minority status and achieve Enosis...
That's not an answer to my question but a load of baloney. Here's the answer...
In 1965 the Secretary-General of the UN summed up the official Turkish Cypriot policy with this paragraph:
"The Turkish Cypriot leaders have adhered to a rigid stand against any measures which might involve having members of the two communities live and work together, or which might place Turkish Cypriots in situations where they would have to acknowledge the authority of Government agents. Indeed, since the Turkish Cypriot leadership is committed to physical and geographical separation of the communities as a political goal, it is not likely to encourage activities by Turkish Cypriots which may be interpreted as demonstrating the merits of an alternative policy. The result has been a seemingly deliberate policy of self-segregation by the Turkish Cypriots" (S/6426).
NB: UN document S/6426 is available upon request.
Poor GR! You have no legs to stand on but hug the dirty stick extended to you by the team AKRITAS!
