Piratis wrote:
Exactly. Why is part of Cyprus TC???
In 1960 was part of Cyprus TC? The part owned and lived in by TC for generaltions? If you find the idea that part of Cyprus is TC offensive then there is little hope of there ever being a future cyprus you do not find offensive as long as there are TC in Cyprus
Piratis wrote:TCs are part of Cyprus, thats different. Because if you say that part of Cyprus is TC, then why that same part is not GC?
TC are part of Cyprus. Part of Cyprus is TC. Don't really see the difference myself? If I say that a part of Cyprus in the south that was owned by a TC pre 74 and that you claim you and your government claim you still respect the ownership of is TC - will you also ask is this part not also GC?
Piratis wrote:The whole Cyprus is Cypriot, and TCs and GCs are part of Cyprus.
The whole of the apple is an apple. The core and the flesh are part of the apple. The apple is part flesh. The apple is part core. (now try that replacing apple with cyprus, core with TC and flesh with GC).
Piratis wrote:This is the non nationalistic point of view. Of course you can believe whatever else you want, but in that case you can not accuse people like "KYPROS ... ".
and now we desend into the 'twilight zone'. I can not accuse the poster refered to as having an intent to cause offence to TC with the choice of his user name because I say that Cyprus is made up of TC and GC and therefore part of Cyprus is TC and part of it is GC ?????