Bananiot wrote:Simon referring to MiltiadesI am glad you are sane enough to accept that you were indeed an enosis wanker and helped set the seed for what was to follow, along with the rest of your generation.
In the 50's the whole of the Greek Cyprus was an enosis wanker, even AKEL were demonstrating with banners shouting e,e,e,e,enosis! If you were around then, simon, you would have been an enosis wanker too.
Simon referring to MiltiadesI am glad you have also confirmed that you would select which wars you would defend Cyprus in!
Miltiades and most GC politicians as well as all Greek politicians as far as I know, have held the view that we can only solve the Cyprob at the negotiation table, not in the war field, for obvious to all sane people reasons.
Simon referring to MiltiadesWhat do you think 'deterrence' means idiot?
We can never, no matter how much we spend, bring our military up to scratch to enforce the notion you "invented" simon. If we could we would have done it tens of years ago. Talking about Israel is also besides the point because Jewish Croesus from across the world provided the pactolus of money to make Israel a regional superpower. Besides, deterrence does not mean solution. What makes you so sure that Turkey would want the rest of Cyprus. The Turks have demonstrated time and time again that they are not the stupid franks we assumed they were.
Simon referring to MiltiadesYour two people argument is pathetic and anachronistic, using a Turkish argument to rid us of our identity. Almost every nation on earth has various ethnicities, what binds them is nationality and citizenship. Cyprus would be no different from anywhere else.
You have distorted the argument. Miltiades and the majority of the political forces in Cyprus have accepted the need for a Bizonal, Bicommunal Federation as the only possible solution that will gurantee the removal of the Turkish army from Cyprus. The whole of the international community is unanimous on this. Yet, you think only armchair patriots like youself care about the liberation of Cyprus. Your prescription is one of disaster. It is simple and moronic, simon.
Bananiot I'm assuming that when people speak of a deterence here they are doing so in the logic of providing a big enough opportunity cost against Turkey in case one of those new Generals on the Turkish national security council thinks about ridding Turkey of the Cyprus problem in some other way.
In the same manner a more gutsy defense policy would demonstrate the exact same thing in situations such as Strovillia. If your counterpart shows a little more aggression then liberties will not be taken because that opportunity cost would come into play again.
Consider 3 years ago when a Turkish fighter jet did a fly-by over Strovolos, had that jet been shot down I doubt very much it would have led to war, but it would have led to a different understanding between the 2 sides.
You don't need to match the other sides armour to provide a detterent, you just need to make it costly enough for them that any adventures will take away resources and political leverage from other issues that are of higher priority to a nation. One of the first things we learnt in officers school.