The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


‘Greek Cypriots

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Postby denizaksulu » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:24 pm

halil wrote:
Omer Seyhan wrote:
halil wrote:
Omer Seyhan wrote:
AmericanGC wrote:You are not a soldier you don't know shit. You tell me where you served viewpoint. I served in Afghanistan, Iraq, and and I Kosovo. I have had the bullets flying past my head, I was even hit once. I know the power of the TAF every well but I do know that they would never be able to take Cyprus it create a mushroom effect of hostilities towards Turkey. It would lead to the military trying to take over the government and destabilization of Turkey. That is not just my opinion, it is NATOs as well


I enjoyed reading your opinion. I think its an interesting opinion based on your experience.


enjoy it Mr Omer huseyin :?:


oh fuck off you cunt


how rude you are Mr Ömer Hüseyin Seyhan ! calm down boy ! be gentleman :!:


Miş mumkin Halil
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby Bananiot » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:26 pm

Never before, in the history of this forum, have so many plonkers gathered together in a single thread.
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby Viewpoint » Tue Aug 10, 2010 11:35 pm

Bananiot wrote:Never before, in the history of this forum, have so many plonkers gathered together in a single thread.


Bananiot can you tell us all first hand and for Kikapus benefit what you have argued against the TC and Turkish viewpoint, I recall it was the army and settlers.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby Bananiot » Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:03 am

I am not sure of the point you want to make viewpoint. My views on the Cyprob are well known too. What exactly is it that you want to know?
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby Viewpoint » Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:18 am

Bananiot wrote:I am not sure of the point you want to make viewpoint. My views on the Cyprob are well known too. What exactly is it that you want to know?


Points that you have argued against the TRNC TCs or Turkey that show your viewpoint is not biased or one sided.
User avatar
Viewpoint
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 25214
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 2:48 pm
Location: Nicosia/Lefkosa

Postby Get Real! » Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:29 am

Viewpoint wrote:
Bananiot wrote:I am not sure of the point you want to make viewpoint. My views on the Cyprob are well known too. What exactly is it that you want to know?


Points that you have argued against the TRNC TCs or Turkey that show your viewpoint is not biased or one sided.

That’s a hell of a challenge! Mission impossible even... Image
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby Bananiot » Wed Aug 11, 2010 11:52 am

I am never any good at taking sides. I take a philosophical view of this issue. For example, if yialousa was a TC she would have been a grey wolf and if GR was a TC he would be extermely contended with the capabilities of the Turkish army. Thus, my views will never be biased for any side, not even the Greek Cypriot side.

I have no doubt in my mind that Greek Cypriots always viewed and behaved towards Turkish Cypriots as second or even third class citizens. Even after independence this continued to be the norm. In 1955 when the armed struggle of EOKA started in order to impose enosis, was the beginning of the end for Cyprus. I believe that Greek Cypriots were legitimate in their aspiration for enosis, but the leadership took the wrong course to achieve this aim. For a start, nothing was done to address the fears of Turksih Cypriots. Only some years back, Crete united with Greece and 40 000 Turkish Cretans disappeared from the island altogether. Today, not a single Turkish Cretan has been left in Crete. Instead, we merely warned the Turkish Cypriots to mind their own business while we set off to realise our dream of enosis.

Turkey had no interest in the Cyprus issue right up to the instance when we took the issue to the UN and internationalised it. Inevitably, Turkey became a key player. Faced with enosis and probably expecting the worse because we failed to provide any safeguards or explain to the Turkish Cypriot community of its position in the event of enosis, the Turkish Cypriot community opted for taksim, with the notable exemption of the left which harboured internationalist feelings. Yet AKEL let down the TC left on this matter even from the late 40's when AKEL thought that Greece would become a socialist state and Cyprus would become part of the socialist world without much fuss. Of course, these were just childish games that did not consider the reaction of the big boys who had vital interests in the area.

Independence granted in 1960 was a blessing in disguise, under the circumstance. However, both sides simply wanted to use independence as a stepping stone to achieve their stated secret aim. Independence was given no chance whatsoever. The argument that it was an imposed situation is just a smoke screen to cover our mistakes. Both sides did their level best to undermine the constitution and the new state. Makarios played into the hands of the TC nationalists by proposing the changes to the constitution. The inevitable troubles that followed were welcome by the fanatics on both sides and were seen as the last stand to settle the matter once and for ever. It is quite interesting to dwell on those years. We came very close to an agreement on a number of occasions, with the most notable the agreement reached between Klerides and Denktash in 1972, with the help of Greek and Turkish constitutional experts. Yet, Makarios rejected the deal (he behaved as an unchallenged leader and he himself decided on these important matters without asking the people or indeed any one else).

Turkey invaded in 1974 with the pretext of restoring constitutional order after the coup against Makarios. The 1960 constitution gave this right to Turkey, to act with the other guarantor powers. It is true that Turkey asked Britain to act together and Greece was under the yolk of the junta that instigated the coup.

What followed the "peace campaign" of Turkey was the forceful movement of thousands of people from their places of birth, the creation of two separate ethnic regions and the import of thousands of settlers. On top, 35 or so thousand, fully armed, Turkish forces, are permanently stationed in the island. These acts remind someone of the methods used during the Balkan wars (by all parts) where the creation of ethnically pure areas was seen as the only safe method of creating stability. One could argue that we are the victims of our geography.

Could we have avoided the inevitable? What can we do now? I think I have answered these questions many times and there is no point in repeating them. Just as a last word, I would like to repeat that a political solution is our only option. Building of trust between the two communities is imperative as well as the fending off of sick nationalists who are responsible for the creation of the problem in the first place.
User avatar
Bananiot
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6397
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2004 10:51 pm
Location: Nicosia

Postby denizaksulu » Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:00 pm

Bananiot wrote:I am never any good at taking sides. I take a philosophical view of this issue. For example, if yialousa was a TC she would have been a grey wolf and if GR was a TC he would be extermely contended with the capabilities of the Turkish army. Thus, my views will never be biased for any side, not even the Greek Cypriot side.

I have no doubt in my mind that Greek Cypriots always viewed and behaved towards Turkish Cypriots as second or even third class citizens. Even after independence this continued to be the norm. In 1955 when the armed struggle of EOKA started in order to impose enosis, was the beginning of the end for Cyprus. I believe that Greek Cypriots were legitimate in their aspiration for enosis, but the leadership took the wrong course to achieve this aim. For a start, nothing was done to address the fears of Turksih Cypriots. Only some years back, Crete united with Greece and 40 000 Turkish Cretans disappeared from the island altogether. Today, not a single Turkish Cretan has been left in Crete. Instead, we merely warned the Turkish Cypriots to mind their own business while we set off to realise our dream of enosis.

Turkey had no interest in the Cyprus issue right up to the instance when we took the issue to the UN and internationalised it. Inevitably, Turkey became a key player. Faced with enosis and probably expecting the worse because we failed to provide any safeguards or explain to the Turkish Cypriot community of its position in the event of enosis, the Turkish Cypriot community opted for taksim, with the notable exemption of the left which harboured internationalist feelings. Yet AKEL let down the TC left on this matter even from the late 40's when AKEL thought that Greece would become a socialist state and Cyprus would become part of the socialist world without much fuss. Of course, these were just childish games that did not consider the reaction of the big boys who had vital interests in the area.

Independence granted in 1960 was a blessing in disguise, under the circumstance. However, both sides simply wanted to use independence as a stepping stone to achieve their stated secret aim. Independence was given no chance whatsoever. The argument that it was an imposed situation is just a smoke screen to cover our mistakes. Both sides did their level best to undermine the constitution and the new state. Makarios played into the hands of the TC nationalists by proposing the changes to the constitution. The inevitable troubles that followed were welcome by the fanatics on both sides and were seen as the last stand to settle the matter once and for ever. It is quite interesting to dwell on those years. We came very close to an agreement on a number of occasions, with the most notable the agreement reached between Klerides and Denktash in 1972, with the help of Greek and Turkish constitutional experts. Yet, Makarios rejected the deal (he behaved as an unchallenged leader and he himself decided on these important matters without asking the people or indeed any one else).

Turkey invaded in 1974 with the pretext of restoring constitutional order after the coup against Makarios. The 1960 constitution gave this right to Turkey, to act with the other guarantor powers. It is true that Turkey asked Britain to act together and Greece was under the yolk of the junta that instigated the coup.

What followed the "peace campaign" of Turkey was the forceful movement of thousands of people from their places of birth, the creation of two separate ethnic regions and the import of thousands of settlers. On top, 35 or so thousand, fully armed, Turkish forces, are permanently stationed in the island. These acts remind someone of the methods used during the Balkan wars (by all parts) where the creation of ethnically pure areas was seen as the only safe method of creating stability. One could argue that we are the victims of our geography.

Could we have avoided the inevitable? What can we do now? I think I have answered these questions many times and there is no point in repeating them. Just as a last word, I would like to repeat that a political solution is our only option. Building of trust between the two communities is imperative as well as the fending off of sick nationalists who are responsible for the creation of the problem in the first place.



A very fair assessment of the situation Bananiot.
User avatar
denizaksulu
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 36077
Joined: Thu May 10, 2007 11:04 am

Postby shahmaran » Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:03 pm

Great post Bananiot.

You are probably the only exemplary GC on here who still stops me from losing all hope with the GC's.
User avatar
shahmaran
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 5461
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 3:58 pm
Location: In conflict

Postby zan » Wed Aug 11, 2010 12:06 pm

Bananiot wrote:I am never any good at taking sides. I take a philosophical view of this issue. For example, if yialousa was a TC she would have been a grey wolf and if GR was a TC he would be extermely contended with the capabilities of the Turkish army. Thus, my views will never be biased for any side, not even the Greek Cypriot side.

I have no doubt in my mind that Greek Cypriots always viewed and behaved towards Turkish Cypriots as second or even third class citizens. Even after independence this continued to be the norm. In 1955 when the armed struggle of EOKA started in order to impose enosis, was the beginning of the end for Cyprus. I believe that Greek Cypriots were legitimate in their aspiration for enosis, but the leadership took the wrong course to achieve this aim. For a start, nothing was done to address the fears of Turksih Cypriots. Only some years back, Crete united with Greece and 40 000 Turkish Cretans disappeared from the island altogether. Today, not a single Turkish Cretan has been left in Crete. Instead, we merely warned the Turkish Cypriots to mind their own business while we set off to realise our dream of enosis.

Turkey had no interest in the Cyprus issue right up to the instance when we took the issue to the UN and internationalised it. Inevitably, Turkey became a key player. Faced with enosis and probably expecting the worse because we failed to provide any safeguards or explain to the Turkish Cypriot community of its position in the event of enosis, the Turkish Cypriot community opted for taksim, with the notable exemption of the left which harboured internationalist feelings. Yet AKEL let down the TC left on this matter even from the late 40's when AKEL thought that Greece would become a socialist state and Cyprus would become part of the socialist world without much fuss. Of course, these were just childish games that did not consider the reaction of the big boys who had vital interests in the area.

Independence granted in 1960 was a blessing in disguise, under the circumstance. However, both sides simply wanted to use independence as a stepping stone to achieve their stated secret aim. Independence was given no chance whatsoever. The argument that it was an imposed situation is just a smoke screen to cover our mistakes. Both sides did their level best to undermine the constitution and the new state. Makarios played into the hands of the TC nationalists by proposing the changes to the constitution. The inevitable troubles that followed were welcome by the fanatics on both sides and were seen as the last stand to settle the matter once and for ever. It is quite interesting to dwell on those years. We came very close to an agreement on a number of occasions, with the most notable the agreement reached between Klerides and Denktash in 1972, with the help of Greek and Turkish constitutional experts. Yet, Makarios rejected the deal (he behaved as an unchallenged leader and he himself decided on these important matters without asking the people or indeed any one else).

Turkey invaded in 1974 with the pretext of restoring constitutional order after the coup against Makarios. The 1960 constitution gave this right to Turkey, to act with the other guarantor powers. It is true that Turkey asked Britain to act together and Greece was under the yolk of the junta that instigated the coup.

What followed the "peace campaign" of Turkey was the forceful movement of thousands of people from their places of birth, the creation of two separate ethnic regions and the import of thousands of settlers. On top, 35 or so thousand, fully armed, Turkish forces, are permanently stationed in the island. These acts remind someone of the methods used during the Balkan wars (by all parts) where the creation of ethnically pure areas was seen as the only safe method of creating stability. One could argue that we are the victims of our geography.

Could we have avoided the inevitable? What can we do now? I think I have answered these questions many times and there is no point in repeating them. Just as a last word, I would like to repeat that a political solution is our only option. Building of trust between the two communities is imperative as well as the fending off of sick nationalists who are responsible for the creation of the problem in the first place.


Very fair Bananiot....The only place I might disagree with you is that I believe Turkey only saw the benefit of the intervention after she landed......I honestly think they thought they would not be allowed.


I just hope that Nikitas does not come in and tell you of the Turkish Cretans that are billionaires and thriving on the island.... :roll: :lol:
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest