The Best Cyprus Community

Skip to content


Famagusta call

How can we solve it? (keep it civilized)

Famagusta call

Postby humanist » Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:07 am

Famagusta call

NICOSIA – Mayor of Famagusta Alexis Galanos has called the occupied city Turkey’s 'Achilles’ heel', saying that by underlining the issue of Famagusta, Turkey will be forced to be faced with its severe responsibilities on Cyprus, especially the ones concerning UN Security Council resolutions 550 and 789.

Addressing Saturday evening an anti-occupation event, organised by the Famagusta Municipality to mark the 36th anniversary since the seizure of the town by the Turkish troops in the summer of 1974, Galanos said that the issue of Famagusta underlines the real dimension of the Cyprus problem, which is a problem of foreign military invasion and occupation.

He expressed concern over Turkey’s intransigent stance on the Cyprus issue, saying that this stance leads to a deadlock at the UN - led ongoing Cyprus talks, which aim at reunifying the country under a federal roof.

Galanos also expressed disappointment with the unwillingness and indifference of the international community as regards the Cyprus problem.

“We are concerned with the unwillingness of foreigners to listen to us and realise Ankara’s actual role and responsibilities in Cyprus”, he stressed.

“Today, we denounce once more the inhuman behavior of Turkey against our town”, he said, adding that at the same time the people of Famagusta denounce the ''criminal indifference of the civilized world towards the problem of Cyprus''.

He said that Cyprus should consider changing its position on Turkey’s EU accession and only support it when Ankara complies with international law and ends the occupation of Cyprus, which is a member of the EU since May 2004.

He continued by saying, “today, we renew our commitment and determination for freedom and return to our beloved town”.

“Our thoughts” he said, “go back to those tragic days of the summer of 1974'' when the inhabitants of Famagusta, in their majority Greek Cypriots, were forced to evacuate the town during the second phase of the Turkish invasion, which bombed Famagusta.

''We were fleeing away, thinking we would return in just a few days'', he went on to say.

Galanos added that “our memory goes even further beyond time, when Famagusta was the commercial and tourist pearl of Cyprus”.

Famagusta was captured by the advancing Turkish troops during the second phase of the Turkish invasion, in mid August 1974. Famagusta remains under Turkish occupation with its Varosha area, still sealed off by the Turkish army, being called ‘ghost town’.
UN Security Council resolution 550 (1984), which is one of the strongest secured by Cyprus to date, condemns all secessionist actions, including the purported exchange of ambassadors between Turkey and the pseudo-state, declares them illegal and invalid and calls for their immediate withdrawal.


http://www.cyprusweekly.com.cy/main/92, ... 1088-.aspx
User avatar
humanist
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 6585
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 11:46 am

Postby DTA » Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:35 am

Just like to point out that the Turkish army never intended to take maras, in fact if the inhabanance did not flee it would be in gc control right now.
DTA
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1241
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:25 pm
Location: LONDON

Postby Malapapa » Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:42 am

DTA wrote:Just like to point out that the Turkish army never intended to take maras, in fact if the inhabanance did not flee it would be in gc control right now.


Stupid Famagustians. They should never have fled in fear of their lives! Otherwise the Turkish army would never have accidentally waltzed in and unintentionally taken control of the area.
User avatar
Malapapa
Main Contributor
Main Contributor
 
Posts: 3416
Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 9:13 pm

Postby bill cobbett » Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:47 am

Malapapa wrote:
DTA wrote:Just like to point out that the Turkish army never intended to take maras, in fact if the inhabanance did not flee it would be in gc control right now.


Stupid Famagustians. They should never have fled in fear of their lives! Otherwise the Turkish army would never have accidentally waltzed in and unintentionally taken control of the area.


What a load of thickos these Varoshiotes were.

There they were in their Jewel of the Med under bombardment from the TA, and bombed from the air and napalmed by the TAF .... and would you believe it ..... they fled!!!!! Jees!!!!!!
User avatar
bill cobbett
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 15759
Joined: Sun Dec 17, 2006 5:20 pm
Location: Embargoed from Kyrenia by Jurkish Army and Genocided (many times) by Thieving, Brain-Washed Lordo

Postby DTA » Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:57 am

Ha ha ha, still does does not change the fact that if they did nAot flee then maras would still be under gc control.
DTA
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1241
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:25 pm
Location: LONDON

Postby MoonageDaydream » Sun Aug 08, 2010 2:19 am

"the Turkish army never intended to take maras"
If so why didn't they just withdraw form it and hand it over to the UN?
MoonageDaydream
New Member
New Member
 
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Aug 02, 2010 12:17 am

Postby Get Real! » Sun Aug 08, 2010 2:40 am

MoonageDaydream wrote:"the Turkish army never intended to take maras"
If so why didn't they just withdraw form it and hand it over to the UN?

Now you’re really perplexing “Turkish Cypriot” brains… :lol:
User avatar
Get Real!
Forum Addict
Forum Addict
 
Posts: 48333
Joined: Mon Feb 26, 2007 12:25 am
Location: Nicosia

Postby wyoming cowboy » Sun Aug 08, 2010 3:27 am

DTA wrote:Ha ha ha, still does does not change the fact that if they did nAot flee then maras would still be under gc control.


and if the civilians would have stayed and faced the Turk army they would have been executed just like many were that fell into their hands, the mass graves in the occuppied areas proves it....
User avatar
wyoming cowboy
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1756
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 2:15 am

Postby DTA » Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:39 am

wyoming cowboy wrote:
DTA wrote:Ha ha ha, still does does not change the fact that if they did nAot flee then maras would still be under gc control.


and if the civilians would have stayed and faced the Turk army they would have been executed just like many were that fell into their hands, the mass graves in the occuppied areas proves it....


no because the Turkish army had no plans to go in maras.
DTA
Regular Contributor
Regular Contributor
 
Posts: 1241
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 10:25 pm
Location: LONDON

Postby zan » Sun Aug 08, 2010 10:46 am

wyoming cowboy wrote:
DTA wrote:Ha ha ha, still does does not change the fact that if they did nAot flee then maras would still be under gc control.


and if the civilians would have stayed and faced the Turk army they would have been executed just like many were that fell into their hands, the mass graves in the occuppied areas proves it....


Many here have said that the GCs left and became REFUGEES before the Turkish army reached them so I would say those mass graves were the work of EOKA thugs who were killing Makarios supporters. I have a GC friend whose father was involved in burying these people. He drove the bulldozer that covered them up so stop your crap :roll: The other 5000 that GR is now forced to quote as opposed to the 8000 you guys were claiming a while back and still your propaganda books are quoting would have been those fighting the liberation forces of the Turkish army.....Sounds about right to all right thinking minds!!!! 8)
User avatar
zan
Leading Contributor
Leading Contributor
 
Posts: 16213
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 8:55 pm

Next

Return to Cyprus Problem

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests